Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

1048 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [PART V 
Civil List Acts (1 Will. IV. ¢. 25; 1 & 2 Vict. c. 2) the funds 
in question, and the Act of 1852 (15 & 16 Vict. c. 39) recites 
the fact that grants had been made without authority, and 
required the confirmation which it proceeds to give. 
In 1852 the power to deal freely with land, subject only 
to existing rights of the New Zealand Company, was given 
to New Zealand, though only to the central Legislature, and 
in 1856 an Act to confer on the provincial councils to enact 
laws for regulating the sale, disposal, and occupation of the 
waste lands of the Crown was disallowed. In 18552 the 
land of the Australian Colonies was thrown open to the 
administration of the Governments and Legislatures, though 
the land in Western Australia was kept under the Imperial 
control, as that Colony was still without responsible govern- 
ment.? Tn South Africa the Cape in 1872, and Natal in 1893 
were in full possession of the Crown revenues which had 
been accorded them with representative government.t In 
the case of the Transvaal and the Orange River Colony, while 
the general land control was surrendered, a curious position 
was left with regard to land settlement. Special provision 
was felt to be necessary for the continuance for a period of 
the power of the Governor over the lands which had been 
occupied by settlers introduced originally more or less deli- 
berately to act as a counterpoise to the Boer population, and 
who from various causes would have been likely to suffer 
severely if left to a government merely careful of their legal 
' 15 & 16 Vict. c. 72, 88. 72-8. 8.73 saved native rights, but was repealed 
{under the authority of 25 & 26 Vict. c. 48) by The Native Lands Act, 
1873, s. 4. Cf also Wallis v. Solicitor-General for New Zealand, [1903] 
A.C. 173; and see 29N. Z. L. R. 1123. For the other sections see Oon- 
stitution and Government of New Zealand, p. 11. The surrender in New 
Brunswick in 1837 (8 Will. IV. ¢. 1) is described by Hannay, New Bruns- 
wick, ii. 1 seq., and see 3 Cart, 20 seq. 
* 18 & 19 Vict. ¢. 56. Cf. also Forsyth. Cases and Opinions on Con- 
stitutionol Law, pp. 174-6. 
* It was given power by 53 & 54 Viet. c. 26, on the grant of responsible 
government, 
¢ In Natal a trust existed as regards native lands under royal letters 
patent. It was made statutory by a Natal Act (No. 29) of 1910 just before 
anion. Legislation regarding native lands required reservation.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.