Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

SHAP. 11] CONTROL OVER INTERNAL AFFAIRS 1051 
It is, of course, easy to censure the Governments which 
determined to leave these vast areas of land to the free 
disposal of the young community ; the lands were not the 
things to give away, in the opinion of Lord Durham, and it 
may be said that to grant them absolutely to small com- 
munities was merely to discourage expansion by settlement 
and immigration, for those communities were not specially 
anxious to spend the revenue accruing from the lands in the 
effort to secure larger populations, which would interfere in 
some degree with rates of wages and the prospects of those 
in the country. Moreover, Canada has not adopted the 
British ideas in dealing with the land in the new provinces ; 
Manitoba received no public lands when it was created, and 
if a more generous arrangement was made in 1885? it was 
merely to transfer a portion of the lands, those known as 
swamp lands, to the jurisdiction of the province; Alberta 
and Saskatchewan received no lands, and the Dominion 
thus has had the responsibility of settling the North-West. 
It has been argued often of late 2 that the system has 
been improvident, that lands should have been retained in 
the ownership of the Imperial Government and used by 
that Government for the settlement of the indigent popu- 
lation of the British Islands. It is also pointed out that 
though Canada has now adopted a vigorous policy of en- 
couraging immigration, still it offers very good terms not 
merely to British settlers but also to settlers from the United 
States, and that it builds up Canada with a population 
which is in large measure alien, even if it becomes Canadian 
by naturalization, and that it tends to weaken the British 
connexion in Canada. In the case of Australia stress is laid 
on the fact that the Governments there do so little for 
immigration, that before the proceeds and control of the 
' See Canada Act 48 & 49 Vict. ¢. 50; Manitoba Act 49 Vict. c. 38; 
Attorney-General for Manitoba v. Attorney-General for Canada, 34 8. C. R. 
287; [1904] A. C. 799; cf. Canada Gazette, xliv. 3210-2: Manitoba Free 
Press, March 24, 1911. 
* The older discussions in Earl Grey, Colonial Policy of Lord John Russell's 
Administration, and in Adderley’s Colonial Policy, are of value.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.