CHAP. vir] RELATIONS OF THE HOUSES 629
been put into force. The Governor granted a dissolution
when he found that the Opposition could not form a Govern-
ment; as the elections were favourable to the Ministry
the Council decided to yield, and finally the franchise was
fixed by Act No. 920 at £17 rental qualification, with a single
vote, whereas the demand before had been at £15 rental
qualification and a double vote.
In 1910 the Labour Government under Mr. Verran intro-
duced into the Lower House and passed a Franchise Extension
Bill, which was intended to confer the franchise on all those
persons entitled to vote for the election of the members of
the Assembly. In introducing this Bill the Chief Secretary
quoted a remark by the present Leader of the Opposition
In the House of Assembly, made on April 26, 1906 :—
It had become intolerable that a body of eighteen men
elected by 52,000 constituents, should have the power to
veto the will, acts, and aspirations of a body of forty-two
members, responsible to 179,000 people. That was against
all notions of British constitutional government. The
Council had become more and more representative of a class
and of class interests. The people of New South Wales,
New Zealand, and Queensland, with their nominee Councils,
had much more political freedom than that enjoyed by
the people of this state, and it was never intended by the
Imperial Government that that should be so when responsible
overnment was given to the Colonies one after the other.
The Legislative Council, however, showed no intention of
accepting the proposal, and threw out the Bill* The Govern-
ment then prepared a Deadlocks Bill, but though it pasced
the Lower House 2 it went too late to the Upper House to be
dealt with that year. A Veto Bill was passed by the
Assembly in 1911, but rejected by the Council.
* In the same year the two Houses were divided in opinion as to the
surrender of the Northern Territory ; see Commonwealth Parliamentary
Debates, 1910, pp. 4647 seq. ; South Australia Legislative Council Debates,
1910, PP. 181 seq., 226 seq.; House of Assembly Debates, 1910, p. 717.
Then the Upper House passed a Bill to repeal the Act of 1907 for the
surrender, but the Lower House declined to accept it, and ultimately the Act
hd allowed to stand and the territory was surrendered.
Cf. House of Assembly Debates. 1910, po. 1110, 1184, 1248. It contem-