Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

638 PARLIAMENTS OF THE DOMINIONS [PART II 
telegram duly acknowledged.! Or again, such interesting 
questions as that of elective Ministries may there be mooted. 
The prediction? that federation would ruin responsible 
government or vice versa has not been realized : the Upper 
House has not attempted to claim control over the Govern- 
ment, and the traditions of responsible government have so 
far overwhelmingly prevailed. 
In the case of the Commonwealth it was anticipated, as 
was natural, that the Upper House, with its fixed representa- 
tion according to states and not according to population, 
would serve as a means of securing state interests against 
encroachments by the Federal Government. 
This appears clearly to have been the view held by almost 
every one in the discussions preceding confederation, and 
it is decidedly curious that these discussions should in effect 
have been so singularly far from being fulfilled. The result 
might have been different had the Upper House been elected 
on a different franchise from the Lower House, but the 
Commonwealth Franchise Act, No. 8 of 1902, provided man- 
hood and womanhood suffrage for both Houses, with the 
result that the only difference between the Houses is that 
the Upper House is elected on wider electoral districts than 
the Lower House, for the present each state being regarded 
as a single area, and therefore three senators being appointed 
at each election. The result has been that the Labour party, 
which is much better organized electorally than its oppo- 
nents, have secured control of the Senate, and the Labour 
party is decidedly opposed to attributing to the states any 
rights beyond those which clearly belong to them under the 
Constitution. 
§ 6. THE CaPE oF Goon Horr 
In the case of the Cape of Good Hope even less useful 
purpose than usual seemed to be served by the Upper 
House, for it differed from the Lower House only in the 
* Parliamentary Debates, 1910, pp. 6300 seq. 
' Sir 8. Griffith, Sir R. Baker, and Mr. Clark, were among the prophets 
—false ones, fortunately. See Quick and Garran, Constitution of Common- 
wealth, pp. 706, 707.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.