1198 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [part V
and engaged in trading between Australia, Calcutta, and
South Africa. The officers of the company’s ships resided in
Australia and were engaged there, but the ships’ articles were
filled in and signed in Calcutta. The officers, though not
entitled to be discharged in Australian ports, were allowed
to leave at such ports if they wished, with the consent of the
master. The ships did no inter-state trade, but occasionally
made short trips from Calcutta to other Indian ports. The
organization of employees to which the officers belonged
filed a claim in the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and
Arbitration for the settlement of a dispute between the
officers and their employers as to the wages, hours, and
conditions of labour during the voyages of their ships. The
matter came before the Commonwealth High Court on a
special case stated by the President of the Commonwealth
Court of Conciliation and Arbitration under s. 31 of the Com-
monwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act, 1904. It was
argued in favour of the Merchant Service Guild that s. 5
of the Constitution Act must be interpreted in a wide sense,
so as to go beyond the powers conferred on the Common-
wealth Parliament by ss. 735 and 736 of the Imperial Merchant
Shipping Act, 1894.
It was also argued that the laws of the Commonwealth
should be regarded as applying to disputes between the
people of the Commonwealth, not only in Australia, but
wherever the parties may be.
The Court rejected the arguments and decided in favour of
the company. They held that in the case of the ships in
question, even supposing that the port of departure was an
Australian port, which was doubtful, it was impossible, as
a matter of fact, to hold that the port of destination was also
within the Commonwealth. ‘The only interpretation,’ said
0’Connor J., ‘ which will give any effective operation to
the section is to take the port of destination as meaning the
port of final destination or last port of the voyage. The
words of s. 5 would then be taken to describe a round
voyage beginning and ending within the Commonwealth.
That is the class of voyage to which in my opinion the section