Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

CHAP. VII] MERCHANT SHIPPING 1209 
but on the other hand, they cannot disobey the award of 
the Arbitration Court, and they therefore cannot pay lower 
Wages in those cases in which the Australian rates of wages 
which are laid down in the award exceed those prevalent in 
the New Zealand coasting trade. 
There is therefore a clear conflict between the position of 
New Zealand and Australian legislation, and the conflict will 
no doubt be still more marked when the Commonwealth 
of Australia legislates on the subject, for its Navigation 
Bill! contains clauses based on the Shipping Act of New 
Zealand, which provide for the payment of Australian rates 
of wages in the coasting trade, and therefore New Zealand 
vessels which engage in the coasting trade of the Common- 
wealth will be subject to the law of New Zealand, and also 
to the law of the Commonwealth, and there will no doubt 
be collision between those laws, just as there has been 
between the law of the Commonwealth and the law of New 
Zealand. 
If it turns out, as seems to be the case, that the Australian 
Act would override the New Zealand law, even in New 
Zealand waters, it seems certain that New Zealand would 
naturally desire to obtain increased power for the regulation 
of merchant shipping, as it would obviously be awkward 
if New Zealand were compelled to conform to coasting con- 
ditions in Australia while the Australians could not legally 
be compelled to conform to coasting conditions in New 
Zealand. 
It should be noted that in the discussion of the case of 
Huddart, Parker & Company? the point was mentioned 
that it was very doubtful whether it would not be possible 
for the shipowners to make good the extra payment made 
mn New Zealand by deduction from the wages earned outside 
New Zealand, so that the total amount paid would not 
© 88. 286, 287, 290. Those provisions allow a seaman to sue for all his 
wages in Australia, and therefore, according to the New Zealand judge- 
nent, are ultra vires pro tanto, unlesss. 5 of the Constitution Act covers the 
‘ase, and clearly it would not do so in every case of coasting, 
'29N. Z. L. R. 657.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.