Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

cHAP. Xx] MILITARY AND NAVAL DEFENCE 1269 
which when serving in other parts with Imperial troops the 
Imperial Act is to apply, and the Army Act is generally 
applicable under s. 71 of Revised Statutes, 1906, c. 41, to the 
Canadian forces, while in time of active service in Canada 
or the Commonwealth with Imperial troops the Governor- 
General on behalf of His Majesty may place the troops under 
the command of a senior officer of the regular army if 
deemed desirable. But in no case are the Dominion forces 
bound to serve beyond the limits of the Dominion without 
their consent, and all the troops employed at Suakim in 1885 
and in the South African War were voluntarily enlisted. In 
every case if the citizen forces are called out, Parliament, if 
not sitting, must be summoned. 
For the government of such forces on the voyage to and 
from South Africa and while in the Colonies there was some 
doubt as to the legal authority. Hence in 1909-10 court- 
martial 2 warrants were issued to all the Governor-Generals 
and the Governor of New Zealand, giving power to convene 
and confirm general courts martial held within the Dominion 
for offences against the Army Act. This, it was explained, 
applied to offences committed by persons enlisted in the 
Dominion under the Army Act, or to offences committed by 
persons raised under a local Act but serving under the 
Army Act. Moreover, a Governor could issue a warrant to 
the senior officer in charge of troops embarked in the 
Dominion if subject to the Army Act, allowing him to 
convene and confirm district courts martial, which warrant 
would cease to have effect when the troops landed at their 
destination. For the return voyage the general commanding 
at the port of embarkation would give a warrant to the 
officer for the purpose of the journey. 
§ 2. Navan DEFENCE 
The defence of the Dominions from external attack has 
never yet been laid upon them by the Imperial Government. 
The result is that in naval matters comparatively little 
' Cf. New South Wales Act No. 12 of 1809; Napier v. Scholl, 1904 
S. A. L. R. 73, at p. 88 ; Commonwealth Act No. 15 of 1909, s. 9. 
* See New Zealand Parl. Pap., 1910, A. 2, p. 47.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.