Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

1110 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [PART Vv 
British ships manned by white labour. The Bill was 
reserved because of representations of the Imperial Govern- 
ment as to its conflicting with treaties (especially the Russian 
of 1859 and the Austro-Hungarian of 1868), and it. did not 
come into operation. As a result of the incident and of 
the Conference, power was obtained in 1907-8, by negotiation 
with Paraguay, Egypt, and Liberia, to withdraw in respect 
of any self-governing Dominion on a year’s notice. 
It must not, however, be thought that by obtaining power 
to withdraw or to exempt self-governing Dominions from 
the obligations of treaties, those Dominions are by that fact 
shut out from the benefits of the treaties in question. The 
rights given by the treaties may be divided into two classes. 
In the first place there are rights which may be roughly 
described as political, such as privileges and exemptions in 
favour of consular agencies; the right to carry on internal 
commerce ; exemption from compulsory military service ; 
from judicial and administrative and municipal functions 
(other than those imposed by the laws relating to juries) ; 
exemption from contributions imposed as an equivalent for 
personal service; exemption from military exactions or 
requests, except compulsory billeting and other military 
exactions to which subjects of the country may be liable as 
owners or occupiers of real property ; the right to acquire 
property movable or immovable; the right to dispose of 
property by inheritance and similar conditions. On the 
other hand, there are matters which are practically purely 
commercial, such as scales of import duties, and it is clear 
that a distinction must be drawn between the two classes. 
An Australian, for example, as a British subject, must be 
held to be entitled in Japan to all the privileges given to 
British subjects by the Treaty of 1911, although the Common- 
wealth is not bound by that treaty. On the other hand, it 
is equally clear that goods from Australia are not entitled to 
the special tariff granted by the Treaty of 1911 to goods from 
the United Kingdom, and as a matter of fact they are not 
accorded such treatment, and one of the great obstacles to the 
development of commercial intercourse between the Common-
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.