Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

1406 THE JUDICIARY [PART VI 
independent judgement of the Imperial officer—the Governor. 
He considered, however, that even so, ministers must be 
responsible for any advice which they gave and be liable to 
condemnation by Parliament; they could not consistently 
with the principles of self-government be relieved from 
responsibility for anything they did. The representatives 
of Newfoundland considered that the power in such cases 
should be vested in the representative of the Crown, and 
Mr. Service thought that the matter should certainly stand 
over until the Australian Colonies were agreed; while Sir 
William Fitzherbert, on behalf of New Zealand, thought that 
it was inconvenient to press the question of life and death 
for party decision before Parliament. No action was there- 
fore for the time being taken upon the question at issue. 
§ 4. Tee CHANGE OF 1892 
The decision of the Colonial Conference remained for 
a time unchallenged, for evidently Ministries were not agreed 
as to the course to be taken, and some at least were not 
adverse to being relieved from the troublesome position 
involved by the necessity of dealing with such cases on their 
final responsibility! On the other hand, Mr. Higinbotham 
felt very deeply on the subject, and it was one of the points on 
which he addressed Lord Knutsford, not as a Secretary of 
State, but as a distinguished person interested in Colonial 
affairs. His language was warm, but in effect he was right 
in thinking that in all ordinary matters it would be better 
if the usual system of responsibility was adopted. In 1888 
the utterly unstable position was illustrated by the action of 
the Governor of Queensland, who declined to accept minis- 
terial advice in a non-capital case ; the Premier at once said 
he would resign, and the Governor had, after consulting the 
Secretary of State, to give way. Then followed a dispatch 
of October 30 to the officer administering the Government 
of the Colony, in which Lord Knutsford admitted that 
Sir A. Musgrave had acted strictly within his instructions, 
but he said that he would have done well to subordinate his 
. (f. Holman in New South Wales Parliamentary Debates, 1911, p. 1296.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.