1128 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [PART V
Parliament declined to pass such legislation, and therefore
the treaty remained a dead letter.
The Treaty of Washington of 1888, which never came into
force, contained in Article XVI a provision for ratification
by the Queen after receiving the assent of the Parliament of
Canada and of the Legislature of Newfoundland.
This was adopted in accordance with the precedents of 1854
and 1871, but the nature of the treaty rendered it clear that
legislation both in Canada and Newfoundland would be
necessary before the treaty could have any effect.
The question of submitting treaties before ratification
to Dominion Parliaments was further discussed in 1909 in
connexion with the treaties concluded at the beginning of
that year with the United States Government! Some
unfavourable comment had arisen in the Canadian House of
Commons because no copy of the Boundary Waters Treaty
was available, though the treaty was before the United States
Senate. At the same time comment was made in the
Canadian Press which implied that the Canadian Government
had been in some degree ignored in the negotiations. In
a telegram from the Secretary of State of January 29, which
was read in the Canadian House of Commons, it was pointed
out that there was a misunderstanding as to the presentation
of the treaty to the Dominion Parliament. The treaty-making
power in Great Britain was the King, acting on the advice of
his responsible ministers in the United Kingdom, who, in
the case of treaties affecting a Dominion, acted in full con-
sultation and accord with the Government of that Dominion.
In the United States the treaty-making power was the
President by and with the advice of the Senate, and until the
Senate had approved, publication in the United States or in
the United Kingdom was not customary. The United States
Senate stood, therefore, in a different position from either
the Imperial or the Canadian Parliament.
The question as to how far it is desirable that treaties
should be approved by Dominion Parliaments was also
discussed in the Canadian House of Commons on May 14,
t See Canadian Annual Review, 1909, pp. 29, 30, 183, 184.