Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 3)

1500 IMPERIAL UNITY [PART VIII 
forward any subjects for discussion was that in his opinion 
there was sufficient work left over from the last Conference 
to occupy fully the time of the new Conference, and that 
his Government had therefore thought it advisable not to 
bring forward new subjects, which would diminish the chance 
of the old questions still in debate being successfully disposed 
of. He stated that his Government still adhered to their 
determination to secure, if possible, the carrying out of the 
project of the All-Red Route. So far as communications 
across the Atlantic were concerned, he did not doubt that the 
matter could be arranged ; the difficulty lay in the question 
of the Pacific and in the attitude of Australia towards the 
scheme. So far it did not appear that any scheme which 
could conveniently be produced would shorten appreciably 
the time taken between England and Australia, and unless 
this could be done it was doubtful whether the Australian 
Government could be persuaded to spend money on the 
service. Moreover, their closer commercial relations with 
New Zealand rendered Australia more unwilling to do any- 
thing to facilitate trade between the two Dominions; but he 
trusted that it would be found possible on the occasion of the 
meeting of the ministers at the Imperial Conference to arrange 
for some degree of preferential trade between Canada and 
Australia, a step which might be assumed to result in the 
increase of the willingness of Australia to assist in the estab- 
lishment of better communications between the Common- 
wealth and Canada. 
On this occasion Sir Wilfrid Laurier made no mention? of 
a question which he had raised previously? namely the 
question whether some recognition should not be given of the 
quasi-diplomatic status enjoyed in Canada and the other 
Dominions by Consuls-General and Consuls of the great 
Powers. The point has been discussed at considerable length 
in Canada, especially in connexion with the question of 
precedence. Consuls at present have no precedence of right, 
as they have no diplomatic status, and it has been brought 
' The subject was not mentioned at the Conference at all. 
t See Canada House of Commons Debates, December 7, 1910, p. 978.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.