JHAP. III] THE CONFERENCE OF 1911 1509
was made also to the Advisory Committee unanimously
recommended by the Imperial Education Conference of 1911.
The committee would consist of the Secretary of State for
the Colonies, the Parliamentary and Permanent Under-
Secretaries, the Assistant Under-Secretary for the Dominions,
the Secretary to the Imperial Conference, the High Commis-
sioners or other representatives of the Dominions, and in
addition the Secretary of State would have a right to-summon
to any meeting the political or permanent heads of other
departments which might be specially concerned in subjects
to be discussed. The committee would be purely advisory,
not executive. It would be advisory of the Secretary of
State, would deal only with matters concerning the last
Conference or preparations for the next Conference, or any
other matters which seemed to be appropriate questions
between both. The Dominion Governments would in every
case be consulted as to their willingness for the submis-
sion of questions to the committee, and the advice of the
committee would be given to the Secretary of State and
communicated to the Dominion Governments through the
Governors-General, though the High Commissioners or other
representatives of the Dominions would of course be at liberty
to inform their Governments of the proceedings. Apart
from Conference questions the ordinary communications of
the Secretary of State with the Governors-General of the
Dominions would continue as at present. It was explained
that the Imperial Government did not desire to press the
appointment of such a standing committee should the
Dominion ministers be unwilling to accept the proposal, but
they thought that a standing authority might be of sub-
stantial advantage in securing efficiency of working of the
Secretariat and the Conference.
Sir Joseph Ward ! advocated the adoption of the proposal
subject to the omission of the express reference to the High
Commissioners, as he preferred that the Governments should
be left entirely free as to what representatives they should
choose. Mr. Fisher? also considered that it was desirable, in
! Cd. 5745, pp. 174 seq. ? Ihid., p. 176.