1524 IMPERIAL UNITY [PART VIII
additional men shipped. The British ship would not be in
a position to do so, and thus British shipping would be at
a disadvantage as compared with foreign shipping, which
was no doubt not the desire of the Dominion. He considered,
therefore, that it was impossible to alter the existing arrange-
ment, and he reminded the Conference that British shipping
was subject to retaliation from foreign Powers if New
Zealand imposed upon such shipping her own conditions.
The rule was that no country imposed on ships of another
country her own conditions as to wages, manning, or
accommodation, but merely took precautions to prevent
unseaworthy ships sailing from her ports.
In conclusion, Mr. Buxton suggested that the question
was one which might engage the attention of the Royal
Commission which by another resolution it had been agreed
to set up, to examine into the commercial relations of the
Empire, and he asked Sir J. Ward if he could not see his way
to withdraw his resolution on that ground. Sir J. Ward!
in reply recapitulated the legal position, pointing out that
the Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, ruled the situation, and
that under its terms (ss. 785 and 736) the Dominions could
only regulate coasting trade and registered ships, and in each
case subject to the royal assent being obtained before the
enactment took effect. The law forbade effective action
against those vessels which carried Lascar crews, and it was
an economic question. They had tried similarly to impose
their rates on vessels which came from elsewhere paying
lower wages, a reference to the attempts to enforce the
New Zealand conditions on the Australian vessels of Messrs.
Huddart, Parker & Co. The position was too serious to
permit of the withdrawal of the resolution. Sir Wilfrid
Laurier 2 then proceeded to support the resolution, but he
argued in the style of Sir John Thompson. that the British
Cd. 5745, pp. 416-8.
" Thid., pp. 418, 419, The argument is not tenable, for after 1867 Acts
cc. 128 and 129 of 1873 respecting registered shipping expressly pro-
ceeded on the power given by s. 547 of the Imperial Act 17 & 18 Vict. c. 104 ;
and in the face of this admission argument is useless. Cf. also 7 & 8 Edw.
VIL ec. 64, which recognizes the effect of s. 736 of 57 & 58 Yict. c. 60.