CHAP. III] THE CONFERENCE OF 1911 1527
of Man, from certain Consular Courts, and the United
Kingdom Ecclesiastical Courts. The cases which came
before it might involve old French law, Roman Dutch law,
the English common law, modified variously by statute in
the several Dominions, and the Indian codes, and it was
necessary, therefore, to adjust the character of the tribunal
to the different classes of cases with which it had to deal.
The Judicial Committee included the Lord Chancellor, the
four Lords of Appeal, all Privy Councillors who had held
high judicial office, two judges with special knowledge of
Indian law, and judges not exceeding five in number from
the Dominions. In practice the members of the House of
Lords and the Judicial Committee were almost identical,
and whenever a division of judges between the Courts had to
be made he carried out the division himself, and took special
care to secure that both Courts were strongly manned. There
had never been any difference of decision between the two
Courts! although there had been differences of dicta, but
such a difference took place between the dicta of members
of the House of Lords themselves.
Lord Loreburn was of opinion that it would be better if
the House of Lords, like the Judicial Committee, delivered
but one judgement, but he recognized that a change in the
practice of the House of Lords was not possible, and he
intimated that if the Dominions preferred that the practice
of the Privy Council should be based on that of the House of
Lords there would be no difficulty in making the alterations.
Moreover, he was quite prepared that the Final Court of
Appeal for the Dominions should be constituted in such
manner as each Dominion preferred for itself. Did the
Dominions desire that Indian judges should sit on appeals
from the Dominions ¢ Did they desire that a permanent
judge should come from each Dominion to deal with all the
appeals or only with the appeals from that Dominion ? It
could always be arranged to take all cases from one Dominion
at such period as would permit the attendance of a judge
* The Court of Appeal and the Judicial Committee have in effect dis.
agreed : see Clark, Australian Constitutional Law, pp. 349 seq.