CHAP. Vv] TREATY RELATIONS 1151
Canadian House of Commons, Mr. Fielding spoke as follows
with regard to the attitude of his Government and the
historv of the question —
Now, we turn to the change of administration in 1896.
I have already said that in the Liberal platform of 1893
reciprocity occupied a prominent part, and soon after this
Government came into power—indeed, if my memory is
correct, even before Parliament assembled—two members of
the Government were sent to Washington with the view of
ascertaining what might be done in the way of reciprocal
treaty arrangements. They did not find the situation favour-
able, and they came back to their colleagues and reported
that they were not able to accomplish anything. There is
one incident in this history that I have forgotten that is of
importance, and that is that in the year 1891 the dissolution?
of Parliament was ordered by the Conservative Government of
the day upon the ground that they regarded the reciprocity
question as so important that they required a mandate from
the people of the Dominion to enable them to proceed to
Washington and deal with that question. The Liberal party
of the day also was in favour of reciprocity. Both parties
declared for reciprocity at that time, and the only question
was as to which one could get the largest degree of reciprocity.
So, if we follow it from day to day and from year to year,
taking the history of the reciprocity treaty of 1854, the early
years of confederation, the period in connexion with the
National Policy, and the period since the change in adminis-
tration down to the Joint High Commission of 1898-9, we
find that throughout all these years, whatever difference
there may have been amongst the public men of our
country on other subjects, there was no difference of
opinion as to the great importance and desirability of re-
establishing reciprocal trade relations with the United States
of America. . . .
We present the arrangement to you to-day, Sir, not
as a triumph of one country over the other, but as the result
of an effort to do justice to both ; we commend this arrange-
ment, Sir, to the judgement of this Parliament as the
President of the United States will commend it to the judge-
ment of the Congress. The one fear I have is that there
may be people who will say that we have made so good a
bargain that the Congress should not approve of it. In times
1 Bitterly resented by Goldwin Smith as a breach of duty and as a proof
of the impotence of the Governor-General in accepting such advice.
mn