cHAP. vi] TRADE RELATIONS AND CURRENCY 1163
former tariff, and the only difference is, that they are now
classed as unenumerated, paying the same duty. But on
the other hand, by the present tariff, the raw material, iron,
steel, &c., used in the manufacture of such goods, has been
raised from 5 per cent. to 10 per cent. ; consequently under
the Act of which the Memorialists complain, their position
in competing with the Canadian manufacturer is actually
better than under the previous tariff. The establishment of
this fact entirely destroys the force of the whole argument
in the Memorial, as regards the trade they especially represent.
The Chamber of Commerce, in their anxiety to serve the
interests of their own trade, have taken up two positions
from which to assail the Canadian tariff, which are, it is con-
ceived, somewhat contradictory. They state that it is
intended to foster native manufactures, and also that it will
benefit United States manufacturers. It might be sufficient
to say that the tariff cannot possibly effect both these objects,
as they are plainly antagonistic; but it may be well to put
the Chamber of Commerce right on some points connected
with the competition they encounter from the American
manufacturers. There are certain descriptions of hardware
and cutlery which are manufactured in a superior manner by
the American and Canadian manufacturers, and these will
not, under any circumstances, be imported from Sheffield.
In these goods there is really no competition ; their relative
merits are perfectly well known, and the question of duty
or price does not decide where they shall be bought. In
regard to other goods in which Sheffield has to compete with
the United States, it can be easily shown that no advantage
can by possibility be enjoyed by the foreigner in the Canadian
market, because Sheffield is able now to export very largely
of these very goods to the American market, paying a duty
of 24 per cent., and competing with the American maker.
Certainly, then, in the Canada market Sheffield, paying only
20 per cent. duty, can have nothing to fear from American
competition, which is subject also to the same duty, and even
if admitted absolutely free, would yet be somewhat less able
to compete than in the United States. The fact is, that cer-
tain goods are bought in the Sheffield market, and certain in
the American. We have in Canada tradesmen who make
goods similar to the American, but not to the Sheffield ; and
if our duty operates as an encouragement to manufacturers,
it is rather against the American than the English manu-
jackson, as any one acquainted with this country well
OWS.