1176 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [partV
the Colonies as separate communities, so far as relates to
their fiscal arrangements, on the ground that the Colonies
are thus treated as foreign communities, when a claim is at
the same time set up by the Colonies to treat the United
Kingdom itself as a foreign community, by imposing differen-
tial duties in favour of other parts of the Empire, as against
British produce.
But the meaning is, I apprehend, to be gathered from the
succeeding paragraph, which affirms that foreign Governments
ought not to be allowed to become parties to stipulations
respecting the trade of one part of the Empire to another,
whether by land or sea : and further light is thrown upon it
by the observations in the New Zealand Memorandum,
that the object of the treaty with the Zollverein seems to
be to prevent the Colonies making reciprocal arrangements
with the United Kingdom, that “if Great Britain were to
confederate her Empire, it might, and probably would, be
a condition that, throughout the Empire, there should be
a free exchange of goods °, and that the effect of the Zollverein
Treaty ‘is to make Great Britain hold the relation of a
foreign country ’ to her Colonies.
It seems, therefore, to follow that, in the opinion of some
at least of the Australasian Governments, the ports of the
United Kingdom should not, as at present, be open to
the produce of the whole world on equal terms, but that the
produce of the Colonies should be specially favoured in British
ports; or, in other words, that we should abandon the
principles of free trade, and return to the old system of
differential duties. The New Zealand Memorandum; indeed,
suggests that the best arrangement would be a Customs
union embracing the whole Empire, but it may, perhaps, be
thought that if it has been found impossible for adjacent
communities, such as those of Australia, to come to an
agreement for a common system of Customs duties, it is
scarcely worth while to consider the possibility of so vast
a scheme as the combination of all parts of the British Empire,
scattered over the whole globe, under such widely varying
conditions of every kind, in one Customs union. But apart
from the insuperable practical difficulties of such a scheme,
it is sufficient to point out that its results, if it could be
adopted, would certainly not be to promote the views of
commercial policy set forth in the papers now under con-
sideration. For, in such a Customs union, Great Britain,
with her wealth and population, must, for an indefinite
period, exercise a greatly preponderating influence, and it