Full text : Report from the Select Committee on Slave Trade (East Coast of Africa); together with the proceedings of the Committee, minutes of evidence, appendix and index

86

MINUTES  OF  EVIDENCE  TAKEN  BEFORE  SELECT  COMMITTEE

Mr.  E.
Hutchimon,

25  July
1871.

Mr.  Edward  Hutchinson,  called  in  ;  and  Examined.

1336.  Chairman.']  You  aie  one  of  the  Secretaries ­
  of  the  Church  Missionary  Society?—I
am,
1337.  Has  your  society  been  instituting  inquiries ­
  with  respect  to  the  suitability  of  Seychelles ­
  as  a  place  to  which  to  send  liberated
slaves  ?—I  may  say  shortly  that  the  whole  of  this
matter  has  been  before  our  committee  for  the  last
four  years  ;  we  have  been  investigating  it
thoroughly  for  that  time,  and  we  arrived  at  this
conclusion,  that  the  Seychelles  was  the  most  suitable ­
  place  at  which  a  depot  for  liberated  slaves
could  be  established  ;  and,  in  anticipation  of  the
Government  agreeing  with  our  view,  we  sent  a
missionary  there  with  instructions  to  purchase  a
property  there,  and  commence  a  training  institution ­
  ;  we  did  not  do  that  till  we  had  ascertained
from  the  fullest  evidence  we  could  collect  upon
the  subject,  that  Seychelles  was  the  best  place
for  the  purpose.  We  sent  a  gentleman  from  the
Mauritius  to  the  Seychelles  who  sent  us  a  report,
an  epitome  of  which  I  have  here,  and  he  also
procured  for  us  a  report  by  Mr.  Swinburne
Ward,  the  Government  Commissioner  at  the
Seychelles,  speaking  in  the  most  favourable
terms  of  the  Seychelles  as  being  suitable  for  a
depot  for  liberated  slaves.
1338.  Would  your  society  be  prepared  to
send  agents  to  the  Seychelles  for  the  instruction
and  civilisation  of  liberated  slaves  who  might  be
sent  there?—We  have  an  agent  there  now,  and
he  was  quite  ready  to  set  to  work,  but  a  stop  was
put  to  the  whole  matter  by  the  Government
refusing  to  send  any  more  slaves  to  the  Seychelles.
If  any  number  of  liberated  slaves  had  been  sent
to  the  Seychelles  we  were  prepared  to  have  applied ­
  for  a  sufficient  number  of  lads  and  children
to  train  and  teach,  with  the  hope,  at  some  future
.time,  of  their  returning  to  Africa.  And  I  say
this  because  the  Committee  may  perhaps  not  be
aware  that  Dr,  Livingstone,  when  he  last  went
to  Africa,  took  with  him  nine  lads  from  our  institution ­
  in  Bombay  ;  that  is  the  institution  to
which  the  Government  of  Bombay  sent  slave
children  captured  in  the  Indian  Ocean  ;  and  from
that  institution  Dr.  Livingstone  selected  nine
lads  to  accompany  him  in  his  travels  into  the
interior  of  Africa,  and  who  are  now  with  him  ;
and  in  a  Report  in  1866,  by  Dr.  Livingstone,
which  is  to  be  found  in  the  papers  before  the
Committee,  he  mentions  that  one  of  those  lads
met  his  own  uncle  at  the  very  village  from  which
he  had  been  torn  as  a  child,  and  the  uncle,  finding ­
  the  value  that  this  lad  would  be  to  him,
having  been  taught  agriculture  and  carpentry  at
Nassick,  proposed  that  he  should  stay  with  him,
but  the  lad’s  answer  was,  “  No,”  he  preferred
staying  with  his  master.  Dr.  Livingstone.
1338*.  Will  you  hand  in  the  epitome  of  the
Reports  respecting  the  Seychelles  ?—{The  Witness ­
  handed  in  the  same,  vide  Appendix.)
1339.  Is  there  anything  else  which  you  wish
to  state  to  the  Committee  ?—I  should  like  to  say
that  we  have  given  this  subject  very  careful  consideration, ­
  and  we  believe  that  the  recommendations ­
  contained  in  the  Report  of  the  Committee
which  sat  at  the  Foreign  Office  are  very  valuable,
but  there  is  one  particular  in  which  we  dissent
from  them,  and  that  is,  the  recommendation  contained ­
  in  paragraph  64.  We  dissent  entirely
from  the  proposal  that  those  children  should  be

liberated  at  the  Island  of  Zanzibar,  and  the^^
handed  over  to  any  master  fi  om  whom  they  migy.
take  wages  ;  it  is  a  proposal  which  we  think
entirely  opposed  to  the  whole  policy  that
Government  have  hitherto  adopted  in  dealiPwith
  the  slave  trade.  ,  .
1340.  It  was  your  society  principally  whi*i
drew  the  attention  of  the  Government  to  tk^'
matter,  was  it  not?—We  have  pressed  this
ter  upon  the  Government  at  various  times.
years  ago  we  went  on  a  deputation  to  the  Intk*'
Office,  which  resulted  in  the  appointment  of  fk
Foreign  Office  Committee.
1341.  The  Bishop  of  Mauritius  brought  fk  ^
matter  before  you  ?—He  brought  the  matter
fore  us  in  1867,  and  since  that  time  we  have  bc^^
perpetually  working  to  bring  public  opinion  ^
bear  upon  it.
1342.  Mr.  Kimiaird.]  Is  there  any  other  pD^.^
besides  the  Seychelles  which  would  be  suita^G
for  the  establishment  of  schools  for  the  liberal  _
slave  children  ?-—1  might  say  at  the  Maurih|\
itself  there  is  a  large  establishment,  which
been  superintended  by  our  missionaries,
there  the  Mauritius  government  have  done  ^vk
the  Government  did  at  Sierra  Leone,  nain^*i
they  have  given  6  d.  a-head  per  diem  for  evß^'
child  we  would  take  and  train.  That  has
carried  on  for  a  long  time  very  successfully  C
deed  ;  and  Governor  Barclay,  in  one  of  k
letters,  says,  if  we  could  establish  a  similar  in:  _  ^
tution  at  the  Seychelles,  he  has  no  doubt  ik''^
the  Mauritius  government  would  make  a
for  the  purpose.
1343.  Mr.  Kennaway.]  You  would  prefer  W
any  settlement  of  slaves  should  be  under  ^  ^
British  flag?—We  take  that  position,  because
liberated  slave  is  a  British  subject  ;  the  pre¿^¿
Act  of  Parliament  requires  that  slaves  shall  l
liberated  in  British  dominions  ;  that  is  the  p^^
from  which  we  start.  1
1344.  Do  you  think,  supposing  the  libet^j^^

slaves  were  congregated  at  the  Seychelles,
would  be  able  to  isolate  them  from  the  immorak  '
of  the  place  ;  it  has  a  bad  character  atpre^  ^,
has  it  not?—It  has  a  bad  character;  the
chelles  consists  of  a  group  of  seven  islands,
the  evidence  we  have  rather  leads  to  the  con^  .
sion  that  Mahi  would  be  the  best  lor  our  0^^
tions  ;  but  we  have  no  doubt  that  we  should  y
able  so  to  train  the  emancipated  slaves  as  to
vent  them  from  being  affected  by  any  iminor^k  j
there  may  be  in  the  place  ;  and,  moreover,  ik
are  only  children  ;  and  it  is  a  point  which  y)
important  to  bear  in  mind  that  a  large  majority
the  slaves  captured  are  children.  à
1345.  Mr.  Kumaird.]  The  Church  Missioß^)
Society  are  willing  to  undertake  that  work'  ,
Yes.

1346.  You  only  ask  the  Government  to

Ijgi'

tribute  a  small  payment  ?—-Six-pence  per  -  .g
per  diem  would  completely  cover  the  exp^k^^i
that  is  what  the  Government  have  given
Sierra  Leone

1347.  Mr.  J.
settlement  at

Talbot.]  Why  would  not  sit^  ^
Zanzibar  be  satisfactory?—
seems  to  be  very  little  evidence  as  to  the
the  Sultan  could  bring  to  bear  to  protect  k
rated  slaves  there.  Besides,  from  what  I  k^i)'
read  I  should  say  that  Zanzibar  is  a  verf  J
healthy  place  ;  the  only  place  where  a  d^^l'
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.