THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
70
called impracticable, is practised under our very eyes and with
such success in Catholic countries that, if the civil government
did not take precautions, the religious bodies would speedily
absorb everything. But here, again, self-interest is brought
into play, only the object it seeks after is situated in heaven.
In joint-stock companies the same difficulty exists with
regard to the choice of managers as that encountered by
co-operative societies. The incentive of private interest is
weakened, but the directors are well paid. They usually have
a share of the profits, and they may be changed if they manage
the business badly ; hence they are interested in doing well.
Furthermore, as the most capable men are chosen, they are
almost always superior to manufacturers who work on their
own account, and thus their greater capacity compensates for
the more feeble action of personal interest. The majority
of co-operative societies have succumbed, on the contrary,
through the shortcomings of their managers. The reason is
evident.
Co-operation as compared to individual enterprise is repub
lican government succeeding to despotic rule. History, and
even contemporary facts, prove that many qualities are needful
in a people before republican institutions can succeed among
them. In order to conduct a commercial or industrial enter
prise properly, certain special aptitudes are indispensable ; and
if working men were to choose one of their number, these
aptitudes would frequently be found wanting in him. His
authority would be disputed, and his equals would not obey
him properly. Enthusiasm for the work undertaken would
keep the co-operators to their duty for some time ; but sooner
or later they would tire, devotion to their principles would cool
down, incompatibilities of temper would manifest themselves,
and dissensions or the incapacity of managers would finally
lead to the dissolution of the society. In order to have a
capable director, it would be necessary to pay him well ; he
would straightway become a bourgeois, living like a bourgeois,
a fact which would at once excite the jealousy of his comrades.
His salary would be about equal to the profits of the single
owner, and thus no saving would be effected. This draw-