250
THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
The principles which used to insure the obedience of the masses
lose their sway. Everything is examined, and scepticism pre
vails, This unfettered examination ends in the denial of all
supernatural sanctions, of the personality of the Deity, and of
the immortality of the soul (to mention only these points), and
leads to the affirmation of materialism. Then, personal interest
becomes a stronger force, with an ever-increasing number of
individuals than ideas of order and of devotion to principle,
and a situation is brought about thus defined by Colins : “ An
epoch of social ignorance, in which immorality increases in
proportion to the growth of intelligence.”
As pauperism simultaneously increases in the same propor
tions, it follows that the bourgeois form of society cannot last.
In one way or another it soon falls to pieces, and the supre
macy of divine right is restored, until a new revolution ushers
in once more the triumph of the bourgeoisie. Society cannot
escape from this vicious circle in which it has revolved from the
first, until, as the result of the invention and development of
the press, and of the absolute impossibility of restricting the
examination of old beliefs consequent thereon, all reversion to
the theocratic form of government has become radically im
possible. When that time comes, humanity must either perish
in anarchy, or organize itself conformably to scientific reason.
It is then that humanity will enter on the last period of its
historical development, the period of “ knowledge,” which will
endure as long as the human race can exist on the globe.
According to Colins, then, a theocratic régime is order founded
on despotism, a democratic régime is liberty engendering
anarchy, while the rational or “ logocratic ” régime would
secure, at the same time, both liberty and order.
Hereafter, according to the Belgian Socialist, society will be
definitively organized as follows :—All men being by right
equal, they ought all to be placed in the same position with
regard to labour. Man is free, and his labour should be free
also. To effect this, matter should be subordinated to intelli
gence, labour should own both land and capital, and then wages
would be at a maximum. All men are brothers, for they have
a common origin ; hence, if any are unable to provide for them-