THE SOCIALISTS OF THE CHAIR.
267
With this theory, the problems relating to the government
of societies are wonderfully simplified. The statesman has
only to fold his arms. The world will go on of itself to its
appointed end. It is the optimism of Leibnitz and of the
eighteenth century transported into Political Economy. Rely
ing on this philosophical doctrine, Economists declare certain
general principles applicable in all times and to all peoples,
because they are absolute truths.
Political Economy was essentially cosmopolitan. It took
no account of the division of men into separate nations, nor of
the diversity of interests that may arise therefrom, any more
than it busied itself with the particular wants and conditions
resulting from the history of the different States. It saw only
the good of humanity considered as one large family, just as
every abstract science and every universal religion, particularly
Christianity, had done.
Having thus expounded the old doctrine, the new Econo
mists proceed to criticise it. They accuse it of taking a one
sided view of things. Without doubt, they say, man pursues
his own interest, but more than one motive acts on his mind
and regulates his actions. By the side of egoism there is the
sentiment of collectivity, the gemeinsinn, the social instinct,
which is manifested in the formation of the family, the Com-
mune, and the State. Man is not like the brute, that knows
only the satisfaction of its wants ; he is a moral being, who
understands obedience to duty, and who, from his religious or
philosophical training, is often induced to sacrifice his satisfac
tions, his welfare, and even his life, for his country, for humanity,
for truth, and for God. It is, therefore, a mistake to base a
series of deductions on the aphorism that man acts solely under
the sway of a single motive, self-interest These “ general and
constant facts of human nature,” from which Rossi would
deduce economic laws, are imaginary. In different countries,
at different epochs, men obey motives which are not always the
same, seeing that they spring from different ideas of well-being,
right, morality, and justice. The savage procures the where
withal to live by hunting and devouring, at need, even his
fellows ; the citizen of antiquity, by reducing them to slavery.