38
THE SOCIALISM OF TO-DAY.
active equalizing agent for profits, wages, rent, and interest. This
is reserved, it appears, for the second volume, never published ;
but this method of successive analyses, admissible in mathe
matics, where one speculates about abstract data, gives entirely
false results when applied to Political Economy, which is con
cerned with facts. To affect to give a just idea of economic
phenomena, without speaking of competition, which is in
general their impelling force, is like attempting to explain the
terrestrial system while omitting gravitation, which is its moving
power.
Another error of Marx consists in asserting that capital is
dead labour, which revives and grows fat only at the expense
of living labour. Without doubt the products of former labour
applied to a new production—for instance, machines—are not
endowed with life. In themselves they are inert ; but if,
owing to them, the same muscular efforts can produce more
articles of utility, may we not say that they are productive ? A
man armed with a steel axe will do ten times more work than
a savage with his flint axe. Both tools are evidently inert ;
but if with the former we obtain much more produce than
with the latter, ought we not to put it down to the superiority
of the steel instrument ?
In order to prove that capital does not produce value,
Marx shows that if by means of a new machine one can
manufacture twice as many articles, each of these articles being
worth only half as much as before, the total value remains the
same. This is plausible, but false ; for the goal to attain is
the multiplication of useful articles quite irrespective of their
money value. The value in use is the important point. If
with a better instrument I obtain twice as many goods, I am
really twice as rich ; for my comforts being doubled, I have
produced a double amount of real value.
As Bastiat well remarks, whenever we change “ onerous
values for gratuitous values ” humanity is enriched. If all the
necessaries of existence were as abundant as air and water,
their intrinsic value, that is to say, their capacity to satisfy our
wants, would be in no way diminished. They would exchange,
it is true, against very much less money, and their money value