PREFACE
ix
Malthus, gave a brilliant and a sound analysis of these
phenomena, which was never refuted. Their valid arguments
were rejected not because they were disproved, but because
they were associated with views and practical proposals
often rightly regarded as misleading or mischievous. The
general acceptance of illogical and inconsistent definitions
of the terms Capital and Demand, and a neglect to study
the actual mechanism of Saving, have caused the main
body of English professional economists to evade all
scientific recognition of the phenomenon of an excess of
general producing-power which is visible in periods of
trade depression. No sufficient consideration has been
accorded to several recent statements of the case, both
in England and in the United States. In the latter country
Mr. Uriel Crocker of Boston was the first to apply clearly
and effectively this analysis to the modern phenomena of “depressed
trade” in advanced industrial communities, and his
latest statement entitled “ The Cause of Hard Times'’ is by far
the most convincing short popular rendering of the argument.
Mr. J. M. Robertson in his “ Fallacy of Saving" gave a powerful
reading of one important aspect of the case, the false or
bogus" saving which a futile endeavour to establish excessive
capital engenders. Some years ago in conjunction
w ith the late Mr. A. F. Mummery I endeavoured, in
The Physiology of Industry, to call attention to the large
issues involved in this line of thought. Several other
writers * during recent years have effectively exposed the
fallacies of Adam Smith’s doctrine of Parsimony and
J- S. Mill’s Fundamental Propositions concerning Capital,
E'S't R- S. Moffat in "The Economy of Consumption.” Frank
Fairman, in various pamphlets. Dr. Hertzka in “ Freeland.” Sec also
The Evolution of Modern Capitalism”, by the present writer.