¿8 THE PROBLEM OF THE UNEMPLOYED
of sociological studies. It is not really scientific to specialise
without any “ fundamentum divisionis ”, and without
any attempt or intention to apply the results of specialised
enquiry to a philosophic interpretation of the subject
as a single whole. “ There is no Social Problem,
there are only social problems,” Gambetta is reported to
have said. This is the attitude of most of our statesmen
and many of our economists: it is the typical position of
the politician and the academic person. Being a practical
denial of the possibility of Social Science, the very existence
of which depends on the admission of unity in the
subject matter, the prevalence of this falsehood explains
why progress in social study is so slow. It also explains
the vague and chaotic character of the general judgments
to which our public bodies of enquiry commit themselves
when they occasionally break loose from the tabulation
of raw facts. A delightful example of this judgment is
contained in the Final Report of the Labour Commission,
when that body, confronted with the necessity of saying
something on the wider aspects of Irregularity of Employment,
gives vent to the following:
“Fluctuations of trade in this country are due to a
variety of causes, the chief of which may be briefly
indicated here. The majority of these periodical changes
are connected in some way with the state of commercial
credit, and the willingness or unwillingness of business
men to embark on new ventures. The state of credit in
every country depends each year more and more upon
the general conditions of business throughout the world.”
Omitting the middle terms of this syllogistic argument, we
attain the valuable conclusion that irregularity of employment
is attributable to “the general conditions of business”!