Contents: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

CHAP. 11] LIMITATION OF LEGISLATION 401 
Federal Council. Tt was held by the Court, on the other 
hand, that the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation had no 
jurisdiction in the case. The section gave jurisdiction only over 
vessels whose first port of clearance and whose port of destina- 
tion were in the Commonwealth. The port of destination 
meant the end of the voyage, and the Act applied only to cases 
where the beginning and end of the voyage were both in the 
Commonwealth. In the case in question the most favourable 
view was to assume that their first port of clearance was an 
Australian port, and that was extremely doubtful, but the 
port of destination could not be said to be in the Common- 
wealth, O’Connor J. said the words of s. 5 must be taken 
to describe a round voyage beginning and ending within the 
Commonwealth. It was no doubt intended to cover the ship- 
ping trade carried on by ships owned and registered in 
Australia, and manned and officered by Australian citizens, 
which for many years had extended to New Zealand 
and the islands of the Pacific and Indian ports. It was 
intended by Parliament to place vessels engaged on round 
voyages in the same position as regards Australian laws as 
a British ship held with regard to British laws, namely, that 
while on a voyage coming within the meaning of the section 
the Australian ships should be, for the purposes of Common- 
wealth laws, a floating portion of Commonwealth territory. 
That being the meaning of the section, it appeared to 
him that when once it was established that the voyage was 
of that description, it was immaterial to what part of the 
world it might extend, so that if it were established that the 
voyage of the respondent’s ships was a round voyage, begin- 
ning at an Australian port, calling at Calcutta or any other 
foreign port, and ending in an Australian port, the ships 
during the whole of the voyage would be under the Common- 
wealth laws and under the jurisdiction of Commonwealth 
Courts. In the case in question it appeared rather that 
the commencement and the end of the voyage were in 
Calcutta 1 
* Cf. Quick and Garran, Constitution of Commonwealth, p. 361; Keith, 
Journ. Soc. Comp. Leg., x. 123-35. 
1979 
[) 
d
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.