The reconstruction of agriculture in the Soviet Union

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1831009781

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-221050

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Gajster, Aron I. http://d-nb.info/gnd/132986779

Title:: The reconstruction of agriculture in the Soviet Union

Place of publication:: Moscow, U. S. S. R.

Publisher:: Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences

Year of publication:: [1930]

Scope:: 31, [1] Seiten

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: VI

Collection:: Economics Books

- = ¥ tS 4 4 uv i = & a 28 "B 2. im 2 - S38 32 2% AGL ADT Groups (Classified Ac- cording to Value of Means of Agricultural Production at Their Disposal fas Bw 5i WINTER WHEAT (Ukraine Steppe) 1. Up to 750.0 rubles a2 i ? 26 2. 750.1-1500.0 rubles.. 55.1 8. Above 1500.0 rubles &K.4 Average for region 52.9 3.1 SPRING WHF *™ ““Tkreire Stepve) 1. Up to 750.0 rubles 2. 750.1-1500.0 rubles 3. Above 1500.0 rubles Average for region 49.2 a8 B.S Difference Be- tween Price and Cost Per Centner (in rubles) 425 +38 +42 1-3.6 11.2 +26 +83 12.6 It will be seen that the larger holdings have a lower production cost per unit and, consequently, more favorable conditions for development and for building ap their resources. The differences in the conditions of production existing between the various groups of small-scale producers created the differentiation of the village, the stratification into separate groups. Parallel with the development of class antagonisms among the different groups of small producers, the period of eco- nomic restoration revealed in all clearness the limited means of production which the small peasant producer was able to command. The unprofitable character of small-scale production, its limited field of operations, are indicated by a number of factors relating, on the one hand, to the means of production which the small holding is able to apply and, on the other hand, to the manner of their application. Thus, for instance, the use of more or less complicated machinery is a preroga- tive enjoyed only by a limited group of farms. In the 11

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The reconstruction of agriculture in the Soviet Union

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation