Répertoire des administrateurs & commissaires de société, des banques, banquiers et agents de change de France et de Belgique

The law of friendly societies, and industrial and provident societies, with the acts, observations thereon, forms of rules etc., reports of leading cases at length, and a copious index

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1751319059

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-129553

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Répertoire des administrateurs & commissaires de société, des banques, banquiers et agents de change de France et de Belgique

Place of publication:: Paris [u.a.]

Year of publication:: [1926]

Scope:: 1316 S.

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Lois coordonnées du 3 Mars 1919 et du 2 Juillet 1920

Collection:: Economics Books

the scale towarc APPENDIX OP CASES. 219 1 S; l : ~"t the directors and a portion of the shareholders :: concurred in the acts complained of. The plaintiffs x-; d that, being dissatisfied with the management, they j; n pursuance of the provisions of their deed of associ- : - given a month’s notice of their intention to withdraw r ■ ;lie society, and that the directors had denied their so to withdraw. The plaintiffs thereupon filed their o recover their subscriptions, and by the present :_u sought to restrain the directors from transferring or : priating the funds of the society at the bankers. The -; lants contended that the proper course for the plain- :; f dissatisfied with the conduct of the directors, was, s ling to the rules of the society, to appeal to arbitrators - - elected at a meeting for that purpose, and if that step produce a satisfactory result, they were then em- .'od to apply to two justices of the peace, whose on would be final. Cranworth, V.-C., said that the :--ras one in which the regulations of the society, and :: tovisions of the legislature with regard to such associ- »:; permitted the members, in the event of a dispute g, to bring the case before the directors for their : - 011 j and if that should be unsatisfactory, to appeal to ators, and ultimately to carry the case before two :; trates for their determination. The plaintiffs, how- ’; had thought proper to apply to the court to put a : _ ruction on their rules, instead of adopting those means *:-Tress which were clearly pointed out by the rules : selves. He was of opinion that there was no necessity :! ie interference of the court, and refused the motion |i; costs. Grinhamv. Card, 7 Excli. 883, a dispute arose between f the members of the committee of a friendly society s : ; lie trustees touching the distribution of a fund in the :-„ s_of the latter, and by one of the rules it was ordered : j Jisputes were to be referred to such members of the pttee as should not he personally interested in the, .. t ; and it was held that the judge of the county court :: lo jurisdiction in such case according to the rule of the f: i y> which provided for the reference to the committee, ;hen to private arbitration, of all disputes, and the :; ion now raised was, whether this particular dispute - ■ me which could have been the subject of a suit in y. The court restrained the judge of the county court k hearing the cause, on the ground that the dispute :: ^ne which ought to have been referred under the f: i rule. *: l 2 i:

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: The law of friendly societies, and industrial and provident societies, with the acts, observations thereon, forms of rules etc., reports of leading cases at length, and a copious index

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation