Das Problem der Wirtschaftsdemokratie

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1819912523

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-208152

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Das Problem der Wirtschaftsdemokratie

Edition:: 2. Aufl.

Place of publication:: Düsseldorf

Publisher:: Industrie-Verl.

Year of publication:: [1929]

Scope:: 186 S.

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Die begrenzte Reichweite des Genossenschaftsgedankens in der Gütererzeugung. Der Wesensunterschied zwischen genossenschaftlicher Gütererzeugung und Güterverteilung / von Universitätsprofessor Emil Wehrle, Karlsruhe

Collection:: Economics Books

1092 ADMINISTRATION AND LEGISLATION [PART V (1) That those Asiatics who satisfy the Colonial Secretary of the Colony that their mode of living is in accordance with European ideas should be allowed to live, with their servants, outside locations, but not to trade outside locations unless they fall under (2). (2) That those Asiatics who had established businesses outside locations before the war should not be disturbed. (3) That with the two exceptions mentioned above all Asiatics should be required to live and trade in locations, and should be prohibited from holding land outside. This provision not to apply to land now set aside and used for religious purposes. (4) All Astatics entering the Transvaal, unless specially exempted, to take out a certificate of registration at a charge of £3. (5) No restriction to be put on the issue of hawkers’ licences, provided that the Immigration Law referred to above is passed. You recommend the acceptance of these proposals by His Majesty’s Government as being the maximum amount of concession which it is possible to make to the demands of the British Indians, in view of the state of public feeling on the matter. On the fourteenth of May you telegraphed that the Supreme Court of the Transvaal in the test case brought before it had reversed the decision of the old Boer Court on the interpretation of Law No. 3 of 1885. The Supreme Court held that that law compelled Asiatics to reside but not to trade in locations. From this decision it follows that every Asiatic now resi- dent in the Transvaal (except those brought in under inden- ture under a special Ordinance) is as free to carry on trade where he pleases as is a subject of English or Dutch origin, so that legislation of the kind now proposed by the Transvaal Government must be in diminution of existing rights. This fact, in my opinion, much changes the aspect in which the matter must be regarded by His Majesty’s Government as the trustees of Imperial interests. including those of Indian subjects of the Crown. On the other hand, the law of the Colony as so interpreted is, as T understand your dispatch, distasteful to the Transvaal public, who strongly desire to modify it adversely for British Indians who may in future enter the country, as well as for those who are now resident there. * Habib Motan v. Transvaal Government, [1904] T. 8. 404; of. Essop and Others v. Rex, [19091 T. S. 480.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 2)

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation