Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

Multivolume work

Identifikator:
1896933912
Document type:
Multivolume work
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Press
Year of publication:
1912-
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Volume

Identifikator:
1896934455
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-236504
Document type:
Volume
Author:
Keith, Arthur Berriedale http://d-nb.info/gnd/119086794
Title:
Responsible government in the Dominions
Volume count:
Vol. 1
Place of publication:
Oxford
Publisher:
Clarendon Pr.
Year of publication:
1912
Scope:
LI, 568 Seiten
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Multivolume work
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part II. The executive Government
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Responsible government in the Dominions
  • Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Introductory
  • Part II. The executive Government
  • Part III. The Parliaments of the Dominions

Full text

CHAP. 1V] THE GOVERNOR AS HEAD 233 
the justice of the censure. They proved that by their votes 
in the Legislature ; but had they not voted at all, or even 
if their opinion had been averse to that arrived at by Parlia- 
ment, it seems clear that they are bound to respect that 
decision and to act upon it as they have done by advising the 
removal. It has been argued that while by the 58th clause 
of the Act, Lieutenant-Governors are to be appointed by the 
Governor-General in Council by instrument under the Great 
Seal, the 59th clause provides that he shall hold office during 
the pleasure of the Governor-General, and that therefore 
while the appointment must be under the advice of a 
Responsible Ministry, the removal may be made by his 
Excellency without reference to his Council, and the 12th 
clause of the Act is quoted in support of that view. That 
clause provides as to what powers, authorities, and functions 
are to be vested in the Governor-General with the advice of 
his Privy Council, and what in the Governor-General himself. 
The argument is not, however, tenable. Long before Con- 
federation the principle of what is known as Responsible 
Government had been conceded to the Colonies now united 
in the Dominion. This principle established that in all 
matters of internal concern the representative of the Crown 
should act according to the advice of Ministers enjoying the 
confidence of Parliament. The concession was not with- 
drawn by the Confederation Act. On the contrary, it begins 
by a preamble stating the desire of the Provinces to be united 
into one Dominion with a constitution similar in principle to 
that of the United Kingdom ; and this has been carried out 
in" theory and practice in the Dominion of Canada from the 
commencement of its existence. The principle forms part 
of our constitution now as it did in those of the several 
Provinces before the Union. It is a part of the lex non 
scripta of the constitution, and any express enactment of the 
principle was wisely avoided. 
_ A comparison between the elasticity of the British constitu- 
tion and its gradual development under an unwritten law 
with the rigidity of a written constitution as existing in the 
United States has shown the superiority of the former system. 
Whether, therefore, in any case power is given to the Gover- 
nor-General to act individually or with the aid of his Council 
the act as one within the scope of the Canadian Constitution 
must be on the advice of a Responsible Minister. The 
distinction drawn in the Statute between an act of the 
Governor and an act of the Governor in Council is a technical 
one, and arose from the fact that in Canada for a long period
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Volume

METS METS (entire work) MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Responsible Government in the Dominions. Clarendon Pr., 1912.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How many grams is a kilogram?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.