Object: The social Theory of Georg Simmel

| 
& >] 
= 
NS 
al 
"= 
ad 
Mm 
1g 
of 
le 
ce 
n- 
at 
7e 
= 
eS 
qy 
at 
wo 
IM 
cle 
(0- 
re- 
hea 
18 
or 
"Ow 
1C- 
‘VV. 
SOCIOLOGY 
3" 
In these cases there is a more or less clearly defined subject- 
matter, but the character of the problems precludes the 
application of the method of science. Neither the existence 
of these problems nor the fact that man is a social animal 
is therefore a sufficient legitimation of a sociology which 
shall be a science and not a philosophy. To be a science, 
sociology must not only have a well-defined subject-mat- 
ter, but its specific problems must be capable of treat- 
ment according to scientific methodology.! 
This does not mean that sociology has to discover an 
object which has previously been unknown. What is char- 
acterized as an object in the most general sense is a com- 
plex of definitions and relationships. Each of these com- 
plexes, if discovered among a plurality of objects, may 
become the subject-matter of a special science. Each sci- 
ence rests upon an abstraction. It regards the actual total- 
ity of any given thing from the viewpoint of some specific 
concept. The totality as such cannot be grasped as a unity 
by any science. Each science results, therefore, from a de- 
composition of the unity of things and a corresponding 
division of labor; and, by virtue of this decomposition, the 
object is resolved into specific qualities and functions. 
This differentiation and division of labor occur according 
to a centralizing concept which makes possible the method- 
ological co-ordination into one subject-matter of the simi- 
lar factors and functions abstracted from different objects. 
In the presence of the highly complex facts of historical 
society, which cannot be interpreted from a single scien- 
tific viewpoint, the concepts “politics,” “economics,” and 
“culture” are indicative of such categories of cognition. 
They may combine certain parts of the facts, with elimina- 
tion of or merely accidental co-operation with the other 
+ For the distinction between sociology and social philosophy, see Book I, 
chapter iv.
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.