I
102 THE A B C OF TAXATION
Mr. George, although he immediately followed
Mr. Atkinson, made no attempt then or later to contradict
Mr. Atkinson’s representation, nor did the other
principal speakers in opposition, Professors Andrews,
Clark, and Seligman, charge Mr. George with advocating
the abolition of private property in land.
Mr. Atkinson said:
Mr. George and myself concur in one point: namely, that
there is no absolute property in land in any States which are
founded on the English common law. In fact, there is, I
believe, no absolute property in land anywhere. Conditional
property in land — i. e., peaceful individual possession of specific
parcels of land ■—■ is admitted to be necessary to its use by Mr.
George and myself. . . . Mr. George holds throughout
his argument to the absolute necessity of giving conditional
ownership, or complete, full, and peaceable possession of land
to those who may chose to take it under the new condition; and
he has justified this ownership in many ways, not only in fact,
but in words. He says, “In applying to public use the power
of drawing on the general wealth which pertains to the ownership
of land, we discourage ownership without use.” In that
phrase he admits the ownership which he later justifies in the
following words: “It (i. e., ownership) arises from the necessity
which comes from the highest use of land of giving individual
possession, and comes from the difference in the capacity of
land.” And, finally, after advocating the single tax on land
valuation, he justifies it only in these significant words: “Under
such conditions, men would not care to hold land which they
did not want to use; and users of land, where their use was more
than transient,would become the legal owners, having the assured
privilege of peaceable possession and transfer as long as the
tax was paid.” . . . What is the right of transfer except
the right of purchase and sale ? What is peaceable possession
and legal ownership, except a grant of property in land by the
State ? . . . Mr. George sustains the necessity of private