i6
EMPLOYMENT PSYCHOLOGY
applying for the same position, and one seems considerably
more desirable than the other, the interviewer may
be just on the point of hiring this candidate when his eye
is suddenly caught by the pin of a fraternity which he
heartily dislikes. The sight of this pin may immediately
cause him to shift his favorable opinion to the other and
less desirable applicant. Anyone familiar with employment
conditions knows that the instances given above
could be multiplied indefinitely.
The casual methods prevalent not only in employment
work but in the handling of workers throughout industry
in general is one of the anomalies of the age.
For fifty years and more, the utmost attention has
been paid to the development and refinement of the
mechanical processes of manufacture. The division of
labor has been carried to a point which would have been
incredible a generation ago. But the division of laborers
is almost as haphazard now as it was then. Now every
large industry has its chemical and physical laboratory,
in which it examines most minutely the quality of the materials
which it receives and fabricates. But the effort
during all this time devoted to the improvement of
methods for handling human material has been ridiculously
cheap and inadequate. As a single and a very practical
instance of this easy-going policy, as applied to employment
problems, the following quotation from an
address to a convention of California railroad men is
given: “Would you, gentlemen, enter into a contract to
buy material from a concern, the excellence of whose product
you had grave reason to doubt? Would you place
orders to the extent of three and one-half million dollars
a year, waive inspection of material, accept whatever was
offered you, and make no effort to get your money’s worth?