I.
Foreign Office to Lord Balfour of Burleigh.
My Lord, Foreign Office, March 14, 1912.
I AM directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to acknowledge the receipt of the letter
signed by the manager of the Eastern Bank and dated the 29th ultimo on the subject
of loans to be made to the Chinese Government.
In regard to the first point raised in that letter, viz, the question of the advisability
of internationalising loans in China, I am to inform your Lordship that Sir E. Grey is
unable to concur in the statement that it is not in the interests of Great Britain to
agree to such an arrangement. On the contrary, His Majesty's Government and the
other Governments concerned have, from the experience of past years, come to the
unanimous conclusion that, both in the interests of their own financiers and investing
public, and also as a safeguard of China’s credit, it is incumbent on them to prevent, as
far as lies in their power, all possibility of a return to the former dangerous policy of
unprofitable international competition in China, which only enabled the Chinese
Government to obtain money without adequate guarantees, and rendered it impossible
for the Governments interested to exercise the necessary control over the terms of any
loans. There can be no doubt that the internationalisation of future loans would go far
to secure this desirable end.
In regard to your suggestion that of any loan negotiated by the Chinese Govern-
ment one-half should be allotted to the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank and their foreign
associates and the other half to the international syndicate to which your bank belongs,
I am to point out that this suggestion appears to conflict with your protest against the
internationalisation of loans to China. In any case, however, it would be an
unjustifiable intervention on the part of His Majesty's Government and wholly outside
their competence to take any action in the direction of indicating the proportion in
which any particular loan under negotiation should be divided between two competing
syndicates. If the Eastern Bank desire to participate in any loan negotiated by the
Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, it is for them, and not for this department, to approach
the latter institution, and Sir E. Grey is of opinion that it would be advisable for your
Lordship to follow the course thus indicated. Sir E. Grey has been in correspondence
with the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank on the subject of the participation. of other
British financial institutions in the loan to the Chinese Government, which is a present
being negotiated by them, and he is fully in agreement with them that a sine qud non
for the granting of such participation must be that the other financial houses should be
in the position to prove that British capital would profit by such participation.
In regard to the loan which your syndicate is stated to have practically arranged
with the Chinese Government, I am to state that this department has as yet heard
nothing on the subject from Sir John Jordan, and this is probably accounted for by
the fact, as stated by your Lordship to Mr. Max Miiller on the 7th instant, that
the negotiations were being conducted by the representatives of the Russo-Asiatic
Bank.
At the same time, Sir B. Grey directs me to inform you that, while disclaiming any
intention of giving a monopoly of support to the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank in
regard to loans in China, it is impossible for the moment for His Majesty's Government
to support negotiations for a loan which might conflict with the terms or weaken the
security of the large loan for reorganisation purposes, which is at present being
negotiated in Peking by the four-Power combine, with the full knowledge of their
respective Governments, and in regard to which advances have already been made to
the Chinese Government by the banks interested, with the full approval of their
Governments. Such advances, made without any proper security, have been authorised
by His Majesty's Government and the other Governments concerned, under the
conviction that the moment had come when it was politically expedient to strengthen
the hands of the de facto administration in China against the forces of anarchy, and
His Majesty's Government feel therefore that they are under obligations not only to the
Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank, but also to the Governments and financial groups
concerned in these advances, not to give their support to any other group in negotiating
with the Chinese Government any loan as described above until the large loan, out of
which these advances and the expenses of reorganisation are to be covered, has been
successfully negotiated, and, above all, until the security on which it is to be issued hag
been definitely settled.
Nog