LENIN ON ORGANIZATION
Democrats must inevitably be different from the
organizations of the workers designed for the latter
struggle. The organizations of the workers must
in the first place be trade organizations; secondly,
they must be as wide as possible, and thirdly, they
must be as little conspiratorial as possible (here, of
course, and below, I have only autocratic Russia in
mind). On the other hand, the organizations of
revolutionaries must be comprised first and fore-
most of people whose profession consists of being
revolutionaries (that is why I speak of organiza-
tions of revolutionaries, meaning revolutionary
Social Democrats). In face of this common char-
acteristic the members of such an organization
must abandon all distinction between workers and
intellectuals, let alone distinctions between trades
and professions. Such an organization must of
necessity be not too extensive and as conspiratorial
as possible. Let us dwell upon this threefold dis-
tinction.
In countries where political freedom prevails the
distinction between trade union and political organ-
izations is as clear as the distinction between trade
unionist and Social Democrat. The relation of the
latter to the former will naturally vary in each
country according to historical legal and other
conditions,—it may be more or less close and more
or less complex (from our point of view it should
be as close and as little complex as possible), but
in free countries there can be absolutely no question
of the organizations of the trade unionists and the
64