656 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS
TaBLE 33.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of
producing farms, and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
IDAHO, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 106 FARMS IN THE TWO
AREAS INVESTIGATED
[Excluding capital charges]

Cost per ton

Less than—
BE Mone mune ~marrmesecwnonsy
Ce. I
) ee emcee aan
Domeaeen meme
Fripmngmmmns mee

i
8
BL
$1.
3:
$15.0
$18.50

Farms

Number | Per cent |

4
Lu
16

0.9
10.4
15.1
24.9
48,1
FL

;

1.

Acres

Number | Per cent

20. 8
134.3
202.9
488.4
661. 6
871.6
796.1
1604.8

1.7
11.1
16.8
40.5
54.8
2.2
Cd

i,

{,207.3

Number | Per cent

366.0
9, 552. 1
3,831.1
8 285. 9
0,931.6
I F81.0
© 021.4
750.7
699. «
“48.4
ab

2.1
14.4
21.7
46. 9
61. 9
76.9
78.8
°5,9
88.9
96. 5
97.4
98.1
99.1
99.6
99.9
100. 0

Li, 66D. 0

TABLE 34.—Cumulation, at increasing costs of production per ton of sugar beets, of
producing farms and of acres and tons of sugar beets harvested
IDAHO, 1922—COMBINATION OF THE DATA FOR 106 FARMS IN THE TWO
AREAS INVESTIGATED
[Land charges on net cash rental basis and interest on other capital at 6 per cent]
[Including capital charges]

Cost per ton

Less than—
$4.09.
$M.) oo
$d.
$5.7).
Foy
Lemmons
LI

“n

. 4.
816.
"90.

arms

Number | Pereoat |

1
2
12
19
33
ie

0.9
L9
11.3
17.9
Ti, !
13.
0

L
7,

go!

’: 4

C

Nn
1
2
03
05
{068

¢ “
97.2
99.1
100. G

Number

20.8
24.8
146.3
242.9
134.9
518. 6
708. 6
"9,1
370. 8
(3.8
“74,8
192.8
87. 4
4
ig
hl
,195. 5
1, 206. 2
1,207.2

Acres

Per cent

1.7
2.1
12.1
20.7
*G.f
3.

So.
99.0
99.9
100. 0

Tons

Number | Per cent

366.0
442.0
2,808.1
4,476.2
7,593.1
.0,349.1
"1, 608. €
> 846. °
962. ¢
793.1
1190.9
if 125.6
"45.9
1,928.4
1.2641
1,448,
34,507. 1
17, 562, 1
17,653.0
17. 665. 8

2.1
2.5
16.9
25.3
43.0
58. 6
65.7
8.
‘4
°f. *
1.7
94.7
07.6
98.1
98.3
98.8
99.1
99. 4
99. 9
100. 0