Full text: Responsible government in the Dominions (Vol. 1)

cHap. 11] LIMITATION OF LEGISLATION 373 
beyond this limit, but not over other persons.” In an 
opinion given by the Queen’s Advocate in August 1854, on 
the question within what distance of the Falkland Islands 
foreigners might be legally prevented from whale or seal 
fishing, he advised that they could be prevented from fishing 
within three miles of the coast, such being the distance to 
which, according to the marine interpretation and usage of 
nations, a cannon-shot is supposed to reach. 
The view of the law officers is shown to have been shared 
by the Government in many Acts; for example, it was con- 
sidered necessary to resort to Parliament to make arrange- 
ments for the hearing of appeals in the West Indies by the 
Courts of a distant Colony. This was done in the case of 
making provisions for appeals from British Honduras to lie 
to the Courts of Jamaica, by the Act 44 & 45 Vict. c. 36, 
and with regard to appeals in the Windwards by 52 & 53 
Viet. c. 33. 
Similarly it is due to the territorial limitation of Colonial 
jurisdiction that Acts have been passed from time to time 
to provide for the extradition of offenders, including their 
legal custody while beyond the limits of the Colony from 
which they are extradited, and for the custody of fugitive 
offenders during removal from one part of the Empire to 
another! Again, by the Act 6 Will. IV. c. 17, it is laid 
down that whereas by reason of the separation of the Govern- 
ments of the said islands it was not possible to arrange for 
the erection of two Courts of Judicature in the West Indian 
Islands, therefore Imperial legislation had to be passed. 
In the Canadian prisoner’s case, Lord Durham had, with 
his nominee Council in Lower Canada, which was a special 
body established by Act of the Imperial Parliament in view 
of the recent rebellion and the necessity for suspending 
the constitution, decided that certain political offenders 
should be banished to Bermuda. It was then advised by 
the law officers of the Crown that the ordinance for effecting 
! Fugitive Offenders Act, 1881 (44 & 45 Vict. c. 69) ; Colonial Prisoners 
Removal Acts, 1869 and 1884 (32 Vict. c. 10 and 47 & 48 Vict. ¢. 31); Hatra- 
dition Acts, 1870 and 1873 (33 & 34 Vict. ¢. 62, 36 & 37 Vict. ¢, 60).
	        
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.