Die Meistbegünstigung im modernen Völkerrecht

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1003351123

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-16006

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Koch, Heinrich

Title:: Die deutsche Hausindustrie

Edition:: Zweite, bedeutend erweiterte Auflage

Place of publication:: M. Gladbach

Publisher:: Volksvereins-Verlag GmbH.

Year of publication:: 1913

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (294 Seiten)

Digitisation:: 2017

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

AGRICULTURAL RELIEF 187 Mr. Keno. To stabilize his product, the man on the outside, whether he joins the organization or not, under the equalization fee, will bear his share of the burden. Yes. Mr. CLARKE. We all grant that. What I wanted to get was your reason as to how it would develop your cooperatives. Mr. Kenor. I have been interested in cooperative marketing for the past five years; I have been giving my time to it, not because I wanted to be connected with the cooperative oroanization—I do not think there is anybody engaged in farming that cares to be con- nected with any kind of an organization that takes his time. And it has taken 75 per cent of my time. Mr. CLarkE. I have been a member of this cooperative for years because it was the only answer, as far as I am concerned, and we have been doing for the last year’s business between %60,000.000 and $70,000,000 per year. Mr. Kenok. Yes; and vou could do it with equally honest officials and half the membership. The membership of a cooperative will cut no particular item if you have equlization fee. And if a man does not care to join that will be all right. Ten per cent of the people engaged in the industry could operate the cooperatives. The scle purpose of the cooperatives would then be to take the surplus off of the market and intelligently market it. It is not so much a question of certain organizations as it is of results. The greatest trouble that the cocperatives row have is to get a hundred per cent nembership in and to hold them and to please them and to satisfy every member. Mr. Care. Do you not believe if you had a membership, for instance, in your Burley tobacco organization of 65 to 70 per cent, with the proper financing of the thing, that you could handle the situation? Mr. Kenor. We had 60 or 70 per cent. Mr. CLarkEe. Had you? 1 thought you said 50 per cent. Mr. Kenoe. No, sir; at the finish we had 50 per cent, but we had over 70 per cent to start. We could borrow money at 414 per cent; we could borrow it cheaper than I could do myself, individually, and cheaper than most businesses could do. We established our credit thoroughly; there was no question about that; there was no com- plaint about our operation. But we could not change human nature, by organization. It takes law to get people, all of them, to do the same thing. Mr. Care. It does not seem to, according to the eighteenth amendment. Mr. AsweLL. Mr. Kehoe, may I ask one question? Mr. Kenok. I think the gentleman from Michican desired to ask a question. Mr. Kercuam. If I got your idea correctly, it was that with the establishment of the equalization fee, so far as Burley tobacco is concerned, that the difficulties you had in getting all the peonie to bear the burden of the loss, will be solved and the energies of your cooperatives may be restricted to the processing and assembling and financing and the problems that relate to 1t, and that other side; 1s that your idea? Mr. Kenoe. I would extend a little further, Congressman. and say all commodities as well as Burley tobacco.

Access restriction

Copyright

Full text: Agricultural relief (Pt. 3)

Monograph

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation