Einführung in die Kriegswirtschaftslehre

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1004940505

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-17272

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Neurath, Otto http://d-nb.info/gnd/118587420

Title:: Einführung in die Kriegswirtschaftslehre

Edition:: Sonderabdruck aus: "Mitteilungen aus dem Intendanzwesen"

Place of publication:: Wien

Publisher:: [Seidel]

Year of publication:: 1914

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (Seiten 2-13, Seiten 2-16, Seiten 2-46)

Digitisation:: 2017

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: II. Verschiedenartigkeit der Kriegswirkung

Collection:: Economics Books

568 PONTIFICIAE ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARVM SCRIPTA VARIA - 2& WoLD I have two comments. The first refers to the entire group of four papers presented to-day (1), all of which deal with purely theoretical highly simplified models of economic growth. This kind of logical analysis has a strong appeal, and that it has a wide appeal is clear from the fact that the three other papers are closely interrelated both with regard to problems and results. My second comment refers specifically to Professor MORISHIMA’s paper, and is a question about the proportionality assumption on page 7 (3). Am I right to understand that this assumption requires, for example, that the demand for food remains a constant fraction of GNP as the economy grows? If yes, the assumption is in radical contrast to the whole outlook of a later paper to-day, that of Pro- fessor GALE JonnsoN. There the whole emphasis is shifted. There exists no such proportionality; on the contrary, the lack of propor- tionality is a universal handicap for the farming population. ALLAIS I have two remarks to make. The first was made by Prof. Worp, namely that there are some quite strong hypotheses in the model. Secondly, I have unfortunately not had the time to study Pro- fessor MORISHIMA’s paper very carefully since I was working in the other group. But so far as I can judge, the MorisHIMA’s model is a special case of a general theory I presented this year in my paper for the Cambridge Round Table of the International Economic Association. Thank vou. (!) Koopmans, MALINVAUD, MORISHIMA, PASINETTI. (3) The discussions having been organized in two separate groups during a first phase of the Study Week, my question belongs to the second phase of joint discussion. Now when reading the proofs I see that a similar question was posed in the separate discussion, but T repeat the question to mark the importance of the issue 9] Morishima - pag. 40

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Einführung in die Kriegswirtschaftslehre

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation