Der Wirtschaftsbetrieb als Betrieb (Arbeit)

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1014011027

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-25942

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Prion, Willi http://d-nb.info/gnd/101278861

Title:: Der Wirtschaftsbetrieb als Betrieb (Arbeit)

Place of publication:: Berlin

Publisher:: Verlag von Julius Springer

Year of publication:: 1936

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (VII, 240 Seiten)

Digitisation:: 2018

Collection:: Business and Management Classics

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: D. Die Wirtschaftlichkeit

Collection:: Business and Management Classics

CHAP. viii] RELATIONS OF THE HOUSES 571 1864, and though they had received a dissolution the result had not encouraged them. Moreover, the moment the new Parliament was opened a vote of want of confidence was carried by a majority of forty-two to fourteen. But he laid stress upon the argument that it was essential to maintain the strength of the Council, which otherwise would cease to have any independent position. A Governor should have a recognized independent discretion ; the nominations to the Upper House ought not to be viewed as mere appointments, the refusal to sanction which might justly be considered an interference with proper ministerial action and responsibility. Her Majesty’s Government and the people of the Colony were entitled to hold the Governor responsible for securing the preservation of the Legislative Council as an efficient branch of the Legislature. The number had been fixed in 1861 at twenty-seven, not as absolutely rigid but as meeting the deliberate opinion of ‘all parties then, and implying a sound principle. The Secretary of State in a dispatch of May 6, 1865, approved entirely the action of the Governor. On September 29, 1868,! the Governor, Lord Belmore, re- ported that he had added three members to the Council owing to the difficulty of making up a quorum. In acknowledging the receipt of this dispatch on December 18, 1868, Lord Granville approved his action, but said that any increase of the number of the Council was likely to be used as a prece- dent for further additions, and was therefore to be regretted, and that he should have been glad to be assured that the addition was not in fact politically material as altering the balance in any important degree in favour of the Ministry by which it was suggested. Lord Belmore submitted this dispatch to his Prime Minister, who drew up a memorandum 2 on the question, in which he laid down that the dispatch was based on a misapprehension, and that the Government could not admit that the responsible ministers of the Governor might not advise an increase in the numbers. In law the Number was unlimited, and the Secretary of State must have overlooked that fact, or he would not have questioned any * Parl. Pap., H. C. 198, 1893-4, p. 71. ? Ibid., p. 79. I)

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Der Wirtschaftsbetrieb als Betrieb (Arbeit)

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Volume

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation