Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

error

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

Object: Graf Georg Kankrin in nationalökonomischer und finanzwirtschaftlicher Beziehung

Monograph

Identifikator:
1020784822
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-33588
Document type:
Monograph
Author:
Fritz, Carl http://d-nb.info/gnd/1050470273
Title:
München als Industriestadt
Place of publication:
Berlin
Publisher:
Puttkammer & Mühlbrecht, Buchhandlung f. Staats- u. Rechtswissenschaft
Year of publication:
1913
Scope:
1 Online-Ressource (163 Seiten)
Digitisation:
2018
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Title page

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Title page
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • A study of student loans and their relation to higher educational finance
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. Financial development of higher education
  • Chapter II. Sources of educational income
  • Chapter III. Allocation of higher educational costs
  • Chapter IV. The student as a financial risk
  • Chapter V. Financing the student
  • Chapther VI. The administration of student loans
  • A study of student loans and their relation to higher educational finance
  • Recommendations

Full text

Their Relation to Higher Educationae Einance 
25 
for example, are sometimes established to commemorate the memory of 
certain individuals. This is as good an incentive as the others, for while 
it is the erection of a monument to some individual, it serves, at the same 
time, purposes other than the individual one. It perpetuates an ideal as 
well as a name. 
Gifts to Higher Education 
Philanthropy has been generous to higher learning. According to 
the figures published by the U. S. Bureau of Education, it has given more 
to the advancement of higher education than it has to all other education 
combined. 
„ . . Gifts and Bequests to Higher Education 
Gifts and Bequests to 
All Education, Including Absolute Per Cent, of 
Higher Education Amount Total 
1910-12 $30,061,310 $28,185,999 92 
1912-14 31,357,398 29,927,138 92 
1914-16 37,093,280 34,845.551 94 
1916-18 29,856,568 27,450,945 91 
1918-20 67,417,156 65,286,159 95 
1920-22 78,330,790 77,400,756 99 
If all the money which has recently been given for the advancement 
of higher education in the way of research were added to the above, it 
would be found that this type of education has been receiving an increasing 
Proportion of the total amount of money which philanthrophy has given 
to education in general. There are three reasons for this: first, elementary 
and secondary education have been better provided for by the public 
than has higher education; second, money placed in higher education 
yields more immediate and conspicuous results—those who have large 
sums to give are generally more interested in the spreading of certain 
ideals and the advancement of knowledge along certain lines than they 
are in merely the development of youth in general; and third, the main- 
tenance of higher education is becoming increasingly more costly. 
Recent Gifts 
The question which presents itself now is whether Philanthropie 
sources of income will continue to be as generous as they have been. At 
first it might seem so, especially if we examine some of the large gifts which 
have been made recently. The J. B. Duke and G. Eastman donations 
together with the five million which Mr. G. F. Baker gave to the Harvard 
School of Business Administration are the most notable. The Eastman 
gift, in all, was more than fifty million, of which over forty million was for 
higher education. 13 This means that fifty-eight million dollars was given 
13 Editorial, “Millions for Higher Education”, Outlook, Dec. 17. 1924.
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Die Sozialversicherung in Der Union Der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken. Neuer Dt. Verl., 1925.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

Which word does not fit into the series: car green bus train:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.