Geschichte der volkswirtschaftlichen Lehrmeinungen

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1029261784

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-50039

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Gide, Charles http://d-nb.info/gnd/117543985; Rist, Charles http://d-nb.info/gnd/172332966

Title:: Geschichte der volkswirtschaftlichen Lehrmeinungen

Edition:: Zweite Auflage / nach der dritten französischen Ausgabe herausgegeben von Franz Oppenheimer

Place of publication:: Jena

Publisher:: Verlag von Gustav Fischer

Year of publication:: 1921

Scope:: 1 Online-Ressource (XX, 804 Seiten)

Digitisation:: 2018

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Erstes Buch. Die Begründer

Collection:: Economics Books

LENIN ON ORGANIZATION able to embrace the whole, or nearly the whole of the working class. We would simply be deceiving ourselves, closing our eyes to the tremendousness of our tasks, and narrowing those tasks, if we allowed ourselves to forget the difference between the front rank and the masses which are straining towards it, or to forget that it is the permanent duty of the front rank to lift ever larger sections to its own level. It is by thus closing our eyes and forgetting that the border line between those who associate with and those who belong, between the conscious and active and the mere supporters, becomes effaced. To cite the fact that we are a class Party as a justification of organizational slovenliness and of the confusion of organization with disorganization, is to repeat the error of Nadezhidin (19), who con- fused the “philosophical and social-historical ques- tion of striking the ‘roots’ of a movement into ‘the depths’ ” with the technical question of organization (cf. “What is to be Done,” page 19 of this book). This confusion, to which Comrade Axelrod set the example, was repeated scores of times by the orators who supported the draft of Comrade Mar- tov. “The more widely the name of Party mem- bers is distributed the better,” said Comrade Mar- tov, failing to explain, however, what advantage is to be gained from the wide distribution of a hame which does not correspond with its denota- tion. Can it be denied that control over members who belong to no organization of the Party must 127

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Lenin on organization

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation