Die Lagerstätten von Wolfram, Zinn und Molybdän in Russland

Die Wasserversorgung in Bayern nach dem Stande vom 1. 1. 1928

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1725947455

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-104774

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Zur Mühlen, Leo von http://d-nb.info/gnd/117027030

Title:: Die Lagerstätten von Wolfram, Zinn und Molybdän in Russland

Place of publication:: Stuttgart

Publisher:: Schweizerbart

Year of publication:: 1926

Scope:: 94 Seiten; Ill.

Digitisation:: 2020

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Russlands Wolframlagerstätten

Collection:: Economics Books

788 PARLIAMENTARY COLBERTISM A.D. 1689 —1776. Pains had been taken to render the tax on tea a charge that was little more than nominal, and that would hardly affect the consumers’. The destruction of the chests was the act of a community, conscious of its own vitality, and Jetermined to protest against the control of any outside authority, whether king or parliament. The first blow was not instigated by economic motives, and the lines of cleavage in the colonial possessions had no perceptible connection with the areas which were exposed to the pressure of grievances under the British System. The sugar and the tobacco plantations, which had received very similar care, took opposite sides; so, too, did Canada and New England, which had developed under very similar economic conditions. [t was unintelligible to the English colonists that the French settlers should not be ready to take the opportunity of throwing off a yoke that had been so recently imposed; but the Canadians were deeply embittered against their neighbours in America, and had no special grudge against King George III. Little cause as the Canadians had to love the British Crown, they had far more grounds for resentment against the patrons of the Five Nations, and would not make common cause with their English-speaking neighbours. The responsibility for the desolation of Acadia? was held to lie, not so much with the English Government, as with the contractors and sailors who had carried off the habitans, and scattered them in the English plantations. Physical contiguity and social antipathy defined the lines along which the colonial system split up, and economic grievances were hardly perceptible in connection with the actual breach. pois 239. Economic and fiscal objects had determined the vere led course taken by British statesmen themselves?, but their belief the line of cleavage om which severance sccurred. 1 Fiske, War of Independence, p. 80. ? The judgment of Burke and the picture drawn by Longfellow seem to me to ye substantially correct. Parkman has attempted to justify the deportation of :he Acadians (Montcalm and Wolf, 1901, 1. 284), but he was not acquainted with some of the most important documentary evidence which has been more recently printed by Casgrain. The British Governors prevented the Acadians from sxercising the right of emigration to French territory which had been secured to them by the treaty of Utrecht; the Acadians were forced to remain unwillingly on British soil, and then punished because of their divided loyalty. Casgrain, Tn pélerinage aw Pays d' Evangéline, p. 112. 8 See above, p. 424.

Access restriction

Copyright

Object: Die Wasserversorgung in Bayern nach dem Stande vom 1. 1. 1928

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation