Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Proceedings of the South & East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Proceedings of the South & East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926

Monograph

Identifikator:
1738588467
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-115043
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Proceedings of the South & East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926
Place of publication:
Nairobi
Publisher:
East African Standard
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
VI, 337 Seiten
Ill.
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Part II. Agriculture
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Proceedings of the South & East African combined agricultural, cotton, entomological and mycological conference held at Nairobi, August, 1926
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Part I. Opening speeches, agenda and programme
  • Part II. Agriculture
  • Part III. Cotton
  • Part IV. Etomology & Mycology
  • Part V. General
  • Part VI. Summary of conclusions and concluding speech by the chairman
  • Index

Full text

PART 11. 
that a great number of plants could be distributed to peasants and 
grown by them without unduly interfering with their ordinary 
agricultural pursuits. We see the ordinary robusta growing in twos 
or threes around native compounds, thriving without much attention 
or care, but of course being amply nourished by a mulch of old 
banana stems and other vegetable waste. These are ideal conditions 
I consider on account of the gross feeding nature of Robusta. It has 
a further suitability to native conditions which I consider of very great 
importance. It is this, the tree if left to grow ad libitum will 
develop into a perfectly balanced tree, always producing fresh 
primaries capable of carrying heavy crops. I do not think that you 
will find on a naturally developed tree any secondary growth or other 
superfluous wood. 
It follows therefore that the native can plant the tree, give it 
ordinary care during the early stages, and then leave it to look after 
itself. It has still a further advantageous character from the point of 
view of suitability to native cultivation, in its long cropping period. 
Unlike C. arabica you do not have the bulk of the crop coming on all 
at once and having to be picked within a few weeks. The ripening is 
gradual, rising to a maximum cropping period round about December- 
January-February, usually a slack period in field work. There would 
be no undue rush with the harvesting and probably much less wastage 
than there might be if the crop had to be handled within a short time. 
I think these remarks all apply equally to the crop under European 
management. I see no reason why Robusta could not be allowed to 
grow ad lib. under plantation conditions; the system would answer 
perfectly. With wider spacing than that given to Arabica the trees 
could be allowed a free development and in about ten years or so 
would reach their maximum vegetative development. Then with 
ordinary cultural treatment they would remain so, yielding year by 
year, for a generation and more. I have had trees in native 
compounds under observation for the past 12 years and they appear to 
be the same to-day as when I first saw them; they do not seem to have 
increased in diameter or height, but they have been yielding year in 
and year out. Picking the cherry from these large trees is not a 
matter of great difficulty. Many of the branches can be pulled down, 
and many of them are low enough to be picked in the ordinary way. 
Small steps will facilitate the picking of the high branches. 
This brings us to the treatment of the tree, and I should say at 
once that I am opposed to pruning where robusta is concerned. In 
commenting on the low yields of our Robusta in the Annual Report 
of the Department of Agriculture, Uganda, for the year 1922, I made 
the following statement: — 
+" These are undoubtedly low yields for Robusta and they are too 
poor to be accounted for by the incidence of low yields following high. 
The fault lies, it would appear, in applying the system of pruning 
coffee arabica to these trees; they will not accommodate themselves 
to it, and from our experience we would recommend that Robusta be 
allowed to grow ad lib., or at least abandon to a very great extent the 
drastic prunings practised on the trees hitherto.”” 1 would add to 
that statement by saying that the maximum yields from Robusta can 
be got only by allowing the normal development of the tree. 
61
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Volume

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Encyklopädie Der Rechtswissenschaft. Duncker & Humblot [u.a.], 1904.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

How much is one plus two?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.