Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance

Monograph

Identifikator:
1740277147
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-132094
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
Place of publication:
London
Publisher:
Stationery Office
Year of publication:
1926
Scope:
XII, 394 S.
Digitisation:
2020
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Chapter VIII. The approved society system
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Chapter I. Introduction
  • Chapter II. The scheme of national health insurance
  • Chapter III. The general attitude to the health insurance scheme
  • Chapter IV. The related schemes of social welfare
  • Chapter V. The development of the health services
  • Chapter VI. The financial burden of the existing social services
  • Chapter VII. The financial resources of health insurance scheme
  • Chapter VIII. The approved society system
  • Chapter IX. Inequalities of benefit in different approved societies
  • Chapter X. Proposals for extending medical benefit
  • Chapter XI. Proposal for dependants' allowances
  • Chapter XII. Consideration of certain major problems
  • Chapter XIII. Miscellaneous questions
  • Chapter XIV. Summary of conclusions and recommendations
  • Reservation by Sir Andrew Duncan and Professor Alexander Gray
  • Minority report

Full text

MAJORITY REPORT. 
105 
Eee 
Ee —— 
considerable difficulties in making the necessary arrangements for 
treatment benefits, and, as a result, different standards of benefit 
are being granted by different Societies throughout the country. 
Few Societies are entirely local, and, as most may have members 
anywhere, the provision of treatment services implies an obliga- 
tion to provide the treatment in areas where the Society not 
infrequently has not got adequate machinery for the task. The. 
marked increase in the amount of money devoted to treatment 
benefits is accentuating the necessity for the administration of 
these benefits being co-ordinated through one local committee 
in each area.” (Kinnear, Q. 23,543.) 
228. We recognise that so long as any particular forms of treat-. 
ment are provided only as additional benefits by certain Societies. 
which elect to give them, and so long as different Societies allocate. 
widely different amounts per head of membership for the provi- 
sion of any benefit, the administration must remain in the hands. 
of the Societies, at any rate, in so far as the consideration of 
claims for benefit is concerned. For, under these conditions, it 
will be clear that there will be a varying standard as between 
Societies, not merely so far as concerns the scale on which they 
may be able to assist their members, but also in regard to the 
scope of the treatment in respect of which help may be granted. 
On the other hand, if it should be possible to eliminate completely 
such divergences by taking any treatment benefit out of the 
category of additional benefits and transforming it into a statutory 
benefit, the whole of the administration would, of course, pass 
from the hands of the Societies into those of the local bodies 
responsible for the administration of medical benefit. In the. 
circumstances that confront us this is a matter for the future, 
but we think that even under present conditions where a treat- 
ment benefit (e.g., dental benefit), is provided only as an addi- 
tional benefit, but has nevertheless in fact been so widely adopted 
that it has been made available for a large proportion of all the. 
insured persons in every part of the country, it would be an 
advantage that the negotiations with the profession by whom the 
service is to be provided, so far as regards the terms and condi. 
ticns of service, should, as in the case of the medical service, be 
undertaken by the Central Government Departments, Further, 
we think that the supervision of the service should rest with 
those Departments either directly or through the agency of the 
local bodies responsible for the administration of medical benefit. 
Such an advance to uniformity would, we think, further imply 
that a greater attempt should be made than in the past to secure 
that the same benefit shall have a more or less uniform content 
as between different Societies. 
Minimum MEMBERSHIP OF APPROVED SOCIETIES. 
229. We have received in evidence various suggestions as to the 
desirability of requiring a minimum membership as a condition
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF ALTO TEI Full text
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Die Berliner Arbeiterbewegung von 1890 Bis 1905. J.H.W. Dietz Nachfolger, 1924.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What is the first letter of the word "tree"?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.