Banking theories in the United States before 1860

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1755492553

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-133529

Document type:: Monograph

Author:: Miller, Harry Edward http://d-nb.info/gnd/1055250875

Title:: Banking theories in the United States before 1860

Place of publication:: Cambridge

Publisher:: Harvard University Press

Year of publication:: 1927

Scope:: XI, 240 S.

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Part III. Bank notes and bank deposits

Collection:: Economics Books

104 BANKING THEORIES IN UNITED STATES The leading arguments for a national bank (passing over the claim that it would aid the fiscal operations of the government) were that it would provide a sound and uniform currency, exert a restraining influence on state banks, and reduce the cost of domestic exchange.’ Hildreth, who doted on applying laissez-faire doctrines to banking, believed free competition was the solvent of all our troubles. The supervisory influence of a national bank was hardly necessary or likely to be helpful. “You set up a National Bank to watch the other banks; but who is to watch the watcher?” he asked? Tucker sought to dispose of the objection that the na- tional bank itself might not pursue a desirable policy by urging the establishment of two or three such banks. Competition would then be furnished on this higher level of our banking hierarchy, and the power of each national bank to do evil would be dimin- ished.? To this Charles Francis Adams justly objected that the ability of any one of the banks to have a beneficial influence would be proportionately lessened. “Tt is the right of the people,” was the interesting suggestion of an obscure essayist of 1834, “under such restrictions as the wisdom of Congress may deem necessary, to furnish a sound federal currency; and the constitution confers upon the govern- ment no power to confine this privilege to a single corporation, to the exclusion of the great body of the people. We are, there- fore, if possible, for abolishing all monopoly, and for substituting in the place of a National Bank a National System of Banking.” 8 Smaller banks, with a capital of less than two million dollars, he was content to retain under state laws; but banks with capital of 1 E. g., see Raguet, Examiner (1834), ii, 141; Tucker, Theory, etc. (1839), PP- 274-279. 4 To ireth, History of Banking (1837), p- 138. H. C. Carey also invoked the laissez-faire doctrine in opposing a national bank for the purpose of regulating other banks. Past, Present, and Future (1848), pp. 179, 180; and Letter to the President (Dec. 25, 1857), p- 15. 3 Tucker, Theory (1839), pp. 328-330; ‘‘ Banks or No Banks,” Hunt's Merchants’ Magazine (Feb., 1858), xxxviii, 155, 156. 4 C. F. Adams, “Theory of Money and Banks,” Hunt's M erchants’ Magazine (Aug., 1839), i, 122. 5 W. R. Collier. Essay on the Currency (1834), p. 8.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Banking theories in the United States before 1860

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation