Documenti ispano-genovesi dell'Archivio di Simancas

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 176352146X

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-145495

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Documenti ispano-genovesi dell'Archivio di Simancas

Place of publication:: Genova

Publisher:: Co' tipi del R.I. de' Sordo-Muti

Year of publication:: 1868

Scope:: 291 Seiten

Digitisation:: 2021

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Documento XLV. Ill Figueroa soggiunge a Cesare nuovi particolari sui moti fkiscani, e sullo stato degli animi in Genova. 1547, 19 gennaio

Collection:: Economics Books

4 BANKING STANDARDS TABLE 18 PERCENTAGE DIFFERENCE FROM DISTRICT AVERAGE, 1019-1025, OF RATIOS OF ToTAL DEPOSITS TO EARNING ASSETS FOR ALL MEM- BER BANKS, BY YEARS AND FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS Boston. .............. New York....... ... Philadelphia. . .. Cleveland. . .. 3 Richmond..... : Atlanta. .......... .. Chicago. .....ovnunenn St. Louis. ............ finneapolis......... {ansas City..... Dallas. .......... ... San Francisco. ......... PERCENTAGE ~r.oM DISTRICT AVERAGE, 1910-1925 1919 | 1020 i 1021 © 1022 ' 1023 ! 1924 | 103s « J < re JT - = $a at . of ~-3.6¢ 40.58 +1.7¢ +x.00 4-0.8¢ 497 BA " 10 +0.19 +5.87 +4.6 4-4.03 “+4. 8 + 5.24 + 7.85 + 7.18 + 4.00 + 7.01 + 9.908 + 8.77 + 0.76 + 9.63 +13.95 +13.67 4 8.00 Iy Jy The variation in the ratios of total deposits to earning assets, as indicated by Table 17 and Chart 5, suggests the necessity of further study in order to determine the norms and tendencies, if any, in the ratios when the districts and the years are considered separately. The first approach to this analysis is contained in Table 18, which shows, for each district, the signs and the per- centage differences of the ratios for the individual years from the corresponding ratios for the period 1919-1925, inclusive. Table 18 indicates that in 1919, 1920, and 1921, all districts? were below, and in 1923, 1924, and 1925 all were above the levels established by their respective averages for the seven-year period 1919-1925. In 1922, the ratios in five districts were high, while in seven they were low. The relative consistency among the several districts, with respect to posi- tion, is summarized in Table 19. TaBLE 19 If the seven-year average ratio in each district is taken as a standard by which to gauge yearly district levels, then it is apparent, generally, except for the year 1922, that what is true for one district is true for them all. And yet there is no mathematical reason why 2 Except Minneapolis, in 1919.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Documenti ispano-genovesi dell'Archivio di Simancas

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation