Idaho

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1795100052

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-179691

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: Idaho

Edition:: [Rev. ed.]

Place of publication:: Washington

Publisher:: Gov. Pr. Off.

Year of publication:: 1928

Scope:: VII, 80 S

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Tables and charts

Collection:: Economics Books

50 COSTS OF PRODUCING SUGAR BEETS TABLE 40.— Returns for capital, management, and labor other than contract and tractor operation SUMMARY FOR IDAHO AND ANALYSIS BY AREAS, 1921, 1922, AND 1923 Amount by which the returns from sugar he oxteel , the cost 0 Gross bp Train, returns for | of capital |. ibang dq sharges, the|C2Pital an | - costs of all manage: direct labor, mm machine operation, and all | indirect abhor costs Gross returns for capital and manage- ment as expressed in per- centage of total capital em- ployed in sugar-beet produc- tion 2 Area and year Value of and and other capital Hours of abor other than con- tract and tractor nperation Gross returns for labor ! and manage- ment 2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) Cents per | Cents per wour of labor hour of labor on machine | on machine operations | operations and indirect | and indirect labor labor 373.0 447.5 1m —-10 & [daho: 3-year average. oo... 1921 ee. 1922 eo. 1923___. —mmeem Per acre 3232 264 Per acre 63.4 61 Per acre e4Q 28 Per cent 510. 46 ~3.34 18. 59 22. 53 [fT Twin Falls— 3-year average. .o..... 192)... inion 1972... 1023___. 13.74 ~2.18 22. 55 22.66 9.38 —4,34 15.53 20. 23 "Labor other than contract labor and the labor of operating the tractors. It is therefore the labor on machine operations and the indirect labor. 2 See Table 34 and footnotes to Tables 32 and 33. 3 These figures were obtained by dividing those in column 4 by those in column 3. 4 These figures were obtained by subtracting from those in column 4 the capital charges per acre of beets harvested, as shown in Table 12, and dividing the result by the hours per acre, as shown in column 3. . 8 These figures were obtained by subtracting from those in column 4 the direct labor costs on machine operations and indirect labor costs per acre, as shown in Table 12, and dividing the result by the value of land and other capital per acre, as shown in column 2. Note.—The figures in column 2 were taken from Table 34, those in column 3 from Table 26, and those in column 4 from Table 12. b All minus signs (—) indicate that the costs. as calculated for use in this table, were greater than the returns by the amounts shown. Blackfoot— 3-yer™ average.

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: Idaho

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation