National origins provision of immigration law

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1796380105

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-196168

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: National origins provision of immigration law

Place of publication:: Washington

Publisher:: Gov. Pr. Off.

Year of publication:: 1929

Scope:: III, 171 S

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Statement of Victor Frank Ridder, representing German element of the United States

Collection:: Economics Books

NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 131 it would restrict this immigration at once by about 50 per cent. I may not be exactly accurate on the figures, but I believe it would involve the reduction of this immigration in the case of the German element from 57,000 to 23,000 or 24,000; and we believe that there is nothing in the record of the German element in the United States to warrant or to justify such a cut, and on the basis of national origins such cut would be made. We feel also that when it comes to the consideration of immi- gration there should be taken into consideration other things than the question of who arrived or who did not arrive a hundreds years ago. We do not believe that that is scientific; that it is worth while or important; that if immigration is to be fixed on some basis that it ought to be fixed on something that deals with the welfare of the United States and the conditions in the United States to-day, and not on something that happened a hundred years ago. I do not want to take up the time of the committee, but I would like to say that one of the reasons why there has not been a larger representation of the German element, that there have not been more persons appearing here, is because we have believed and felt that this matter had been definitely disposed of by the pledges of the candi- Jates in the last election, by the attitude of the two major parties on this proposition, and that that had more or less settled the matter. But since these hearings have come up we are down here to register this protest; to say that we think it is an unfair basis. There are many other matters in relation to the quota law that we object to, but we think that they are secondary to this one important matter; that it is an injustice to base the immigration of to-day on hap- penings of a hundred years ago, particularly as there is nothing in the record of the German elément to create in anyone's mind the impression that they are not a desirable element. Their whole record ever since the country has been founded has been a good one, and we believe that the basis should be fixed on something else, not on the national-origins clause. The CHARMAN. Are there any question ? Senator Rerp. Yes; I would like to ask Mr. Ridder a couple of questions. Do you believe in restricting immigration at all, Mr. Ridder? Mr. Roper. I believe in restricting immigration somewhat, ac- cording to the conditions, but I believe that the restriction should be selective; that it is not a good basis to say, for example, that out of a certain country so many people can come. whether desirable or undesirable. Senator Reep. You do not believe in the numerical limitation of immigration from particular countries? Mr. Ripper. No; I believe that the individual immigrants would give us a better basis to work on than to say, for example, that out of any country a certain number should come, good, bad, or indiffer- ent; that we have a much better way of selecting immigration, and that would be to make it a personal selection rather than a group selection. Senator Reep. Do you think we could ever agree on what immi- grants were the best?

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: National origins provision of immigration law

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation