National origins provision of immigration law

Bibliographic data

Monograph

Identifikator:: 1796380105

URN:: urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-196168

Document type:: Monograph

Title:: National origins provision of immigration law

Place of publication:: Washington

Publisher:: Gov. Pr. Off.

Year of publication:: 1929

Scope:: III, 171 S

Digitisation:: 2022

Collection:: Economics Books

Usage license:: Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:: Monograph

Structure type:: Chapter

Title:: Statement of Victor Frank Ridder, representing German element of the United States

Collection:: Economics Books

NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 135 Mr. Roper. Oh, yes. Senator Reep. So the discrimination is one against Germany? Mr. Ripper. It has nothing to do with Germany. I am not ob- jecting on the ground of discrimination against the Germans. I would be just as ready to protest if I thought the discrimination were against the British. I am speaking personally in this matter. But it 1s a wrong basis; in other words, the basis would be wrong if it gave the Germans 100,000 and the British 10,000; it would still be wrong. Senator Resp. I think we are in agreement that we ought not to {iseriminate against a people because of nationality? Mr. Ripper. Nor should we base this on theory, set up with those back so very far. In other words, what happened in 1790 we say zhould not be used in dealing with the situation to-day; should not be used as a basis in dealing with a situation to-day, because con- ditions are different. Senator Rep, Why should we not base the quota on the foreign- born 1920 basis exclusively? Mr. Ripper. If you are going to base it on anything, you could take that as well as any: but I think there should be an entirely Jifferent basis. Senator Reep. Then really one-seventh of our immigration would be Polish, one-sixth Italian, and about one-eighth German? : Mr. Roper. That would not change anything; that basis is still wrong. It does not make any difference who comes in under it, if the basis is wrong. Senator Reep. You do not believe in the quota system? Mr. Ripper. I am not down here to protest against this basis, be- cause it is going to cut German immigration and increase the British. [ am down here to protest against the injustice toward any immigra- tion, to basing this immigration law on something so intangible. In other words, if the basis is fair, everybody ought to be willing to take what comes to them, take their medicine if it is against them, and accept the benefits if there are any. But there ought to be some- thing everybody, at least, could agree is a fair basis, and that 1790 basis does not seem to us to be a fair basis. In other words, if the country had been wholly organized then as it is to-day, and if we could say that the immigration that came over at that time could be placed definitely, so there would not be created in the minds of any- one who has studied it at least a very marked doubt that this basis is a weak one to go on, that is unscientific, is not really worth much, is not anything a business man would base his judgment on in deciding a business matter, then our protest would not be quite so loud. But when it comes to a matter based on something like that we sav there aught to be a better basis than that. Senator REeEp. And you believe, then, in limiting the aggregate and choosing immigrants by selection as to their worth? ) Mr. Ripper. Yes; I think that we micht have a larger auota then, what is the total, 165,000% Senator Rep. One hundred sixty-four thousand. Mr. Ripper. One hundred sixty-four thousand. It would be my judgment we could go above that if we knew that the immigration coming over was as nearly desirable as we can get it. Of course,

Access restriction

Copyright

fullscreen: National origins provision of immigration law

Monograph

Chapter

Table of contents

Download

Monograph

Chapter

This page

Image fragment

Citation links

Citation recommendation