Digitalisate EconBiz Logo Full screen
  • First image
  • Previous image
  • Next image
  • Last image
  • Show double pages
Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

National origins provision of immigration law

Access restriction


Copyright

The copyright and related rights status of this record has not been evaluated or is not clear. Please refer to the organization that has made the Item available for more information.

Bibliographic data

fullscreen: National origins provision of immigration law

Monograph

Identifikator:
1796380105
URN:
urn:nbn:de:zbw-retromon-196168
Document type:
Monograph
Title:
National origins provision of immigration law
Place of publication:
Washington
Publisher:
Gov. Pr. Off.
Year of publication:
1929
Scope:
III, 171 S
Digitisation:
2022
Collection:
Economics Books
Usage license:
Get license information via the feedback formular.

Chapter

Document type:
Monograph
Structure type:
Chapter
Title:
Statement of Hon. John W. McCormack, representive in congress from the state of Massachusetts
Collection:
Economics Books

Contents

Table of contents

  • National origins provision of immigration law
  • Title page
  • Contents
  • Statement of hon. Wilbur J. Carr, assistant secretary, Department of State
  • Statement of Samuel W. Boggs, geographer, Department of State
  • Statement of Dr. Joseph A. Hill, assistant to the director of the census, Department of Commerce
  • Statement of hon. Robe Carl White, assistant secretary, Department of Labor
  • Statement of hon. Harry E. Hull, commissioner general of immigration, Department of Labor
  • Statement of Demarest Lloyd, representing delegation of patriotic societies, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Bell Gurnee, representing National Civic Federation, Women's Department
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary-general, representing the Sons of American Revolution
  • Statement of John B. Trevor, National Immigration Restriction Conference, New York City
  • Statement of Dr. Herbert Friedenwald, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of hon. B. carroll Reece, representative in congress from the State of Tennessee
  • Statement of col. John Thomas Taylor, representing the American Legion, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Edward R. lewis, chairman executive committee, Immigration Restriction Legislation, Chicago, Ill.
  • Statement of Frank B. Steele, secretary General Sons of American Revolution, 1227 Sixteenth Street, Washington, D.C. - resumed
  • Statement of Samuel A. Mathewson, University Club, New York City
  • Statement of Victor Frank Ridder, representing German element of the United States
  • Statement of Hon. John W. McCormack, representive in congress from the state of Massachusetts
  • Statement of J. Edward Cassidy, executive director United States Air Force Association, Washington , D.C.
  • Statement of Maj. Gist Blair, representing the military order of the World War, Washington, D.C.
  • Statement of Frances H. Kinnicutt, immigration restriction league, and allied patriotic society, New York City

Full text

NATIONAL ORIGINS PROVISION OF IMMIGRATION LAW 143 
Senator Reep. Then your position is that the action of the Legion 
convention was wrong } 
Representative McCormack. The action of the representative as 
expressed, and naturally he follows out the action of the Legion 
convention, in my opinion, does not represent the rank and file of 
the American Legion. 
Senator Rerp. What source of information have you about the 
rank and file attitude of the American Legion? 
Representative McCormack. I know that this is not a sectional 
matter. This question does not confine itself to any one area of our 
country; it concerns the people in every State of the Union. 
Senator REeep. Yes; and there were representatives at that con- 
vention from every State of the Union, were there not? 
Representative McCorsrack. While I have never attended a con- 
vention, the primary matter of interest in the convention is the elec- 
tion of its officers. 
Senator Reep. You think they are not interested in national prob- 
lems ¢ 
Representative McCormack. Probably my remark needs a little 
further explanation. I do not want to say the primary matter of 
interest in the convention is the election of officers. I will explain 
that so it will be interpreted correctly. The primary duty from a 
practical angle which shapes up in the minds of the delegates, or a 
good portion of them, is the lining up of State organizations and 
Jelegations behind this or that man for national commander and 
other offices, and many times in the activity of that work platforms 
are adopted without a profound understanding. 
Here is something you gentlemen have been considering for 
years, and yet in this committee and in the House committee men 
actuated by the high desire of rendering public service as their 
conscience dictates differ; and yet you are seeking more information. 
You want something more. You are seeking light. You want it, 
and you welcome people coming before you in order to get a thought. 
The gentleman who just spoke before gave me a thought when he 
said, “ Would you as a business man look upon the 1790 census as 
a basis for determining origins?” 
Senator Harris, Will you allow me to ask you a question? 
Representative McCormack. Yes, sir. 
Senator Harris. What is more important or what is anything like 
as important as a meeting of the American Legion, when this ques- 
tion was before Congress, in view of the record that the Senator 
from Pennsylvania just told you of, the number that claimed exemp- 
tion during the war, it seems to me there was nothing more vital 
to the men who fought and the men who are going to fight than 
just the information showing the number that claimed exemption? 
Representative McCormack. All right. 
Senator Harris. What we would just like to know is what was 
more important for the American Legion to decide than that? 
Representative McCormack. In presenting those facts they should 
also present the fact as to the number of American citizens who 
claimed exemptions. In following that out they should cold-blood- 
edly, if they wanted to advance that as an argument, state how many
	        

Download

Download

Here you will find download options and citation links to the record and current image.

Monograph

METS MARC XML Dublin Core RIS Mirador ALTO TEI Full text PDF EPUB DFG-Viewer Back to EconBiz
TOC

Chapter

PDF RIS

This page

PDF
Download

Image fragment

Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame Link to IIIF image fragment

Citation links

Citation links

Monograph

To quote this record the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Chapter

To quote this structural element, the following variants are available:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

This page

To quote this image the following variants are available:
URN:
Here you can copy a Goobi viewer own URL:

Citation recommendation

Die Meistbegünstigung Im Modernen Völkerrecht. Springer, 1930.
Please check the citation before using it.

Image manipulation tools

Tools not available

Share image region

Use the mouse to select the image area you want to share.
Please select which information should be copied to the clipboard by clicking on the link:
  • Link to the viewer page with highlighted frame
  • Link to IIIF image fragment

Contact

Have you found an error? Do you have any suggestions for making our service even better or any other questions about this page? Please write to us and we'll make sure we get back to you.

What color is the blue sky?:

I hereby confirm the use of my personal data within the context of the enquiry made.